Kelly Hyman

From the criminal perspective, yeah. So also potentially FBI agents, people that went to his house and people that did the affidavit and probable cause in order to substantiate the fact to go there. So you're going to see a lot of people like that, FBI agents. And so from the government's perspective, you're going to have a lot of experts as well. Definitely

From the criminal perspective, yeah. So also potentially FBI agents, people that went to his house and people that did the affidavit and probable cause in order to substantiate the fact to go there. So you're going to see a lot of people like that, FBI agents. And so from the government's perspective, you're going to have a lot of experts as well. Definitely

expert-driven in regards to the criminal cases.

expert-driven in regards to the criminal cases.

It's possible. I could definitely see that and also the statements that he made. So it's important to remember, usually the attorney will tell his client not to make statements in regards to any type of case or potential case because those statements can be used against you. in a court of law.

It's possible. I could definitely see that and also the statements that he made. So it's important to remember, usually the attorney will tell his client not to make statements in regards to any type of case or potential case because those statements can be used against you. in a court of law.

So anything that was said, anything that was posted, also any communication other than his attorneys, there are some spousal privileges, but that gets really more complex. The communication that they have is not protected. So potentially if talking to someone else or someone else's messages that was sent to someone or any type of other communication can be used against him.

So anything that was said, anything that was posted, also any communication other than his attorneys, there are some spousal privileges, but that gets really more complex. The communication that they have is not protected. So potentially if talking to someone else or someone else's messages that was sent to someone or any type of other communication can be used against him.

And so I could definitely see that. coming up. But the argument can be made is that could go both ways from the argument standpoint of he was being accountable, right, and apologizing and owning up to it. But the other side of the coin is, yes, he's admitting that he did it. And therefore, because he did it, he allegedly has a propensity to do it again.

And so I could definitely see that. coming up. But the argument can be made is that could go both ways from the argument standpoint of he was being accountable, right, and apologizing and owning up to it. But the other side of the coin is, yes, he's admitting that he did it. And therefore, because he did it, he allegedly has a propensity to do it again.