Aaron Siri

They would actually be kind of in some ways, forget ethics and morality, they would in many ways violate their fiduciary duty to their shareholders to test the vaccine too much. If they know too much. If they know too much, then it won't get licensed. It's a perversion of it. And then after, so not only do they gut

Not only did they gut the economic interest, there is one other way you assure product safety. It's a far weaker way. It's not very good, but it's there. And that's regulators. And they have a role to play. They have a role to play.

Not only did they gut the economic interest, there is one other way you assure product safety. It's a far weaker way. It's not very good, but it's there. And that's regulators. And they have a role to play. They have a role to play.

Not only did they gut the economic interest, there is one other way you assure product safety. It's a far weaker way. It's not very good, but it's there. And that's regulators. And they have a role to play. They have a role to play.

But the regulators here are completely conflicted because HHS, the Department of Health and Human Services, is the department of the federal government in which you have the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, all of the health agencies, okay? And it is responsible for promoting vaccines. So it's responsible for the safety of vaccines and promoting vaccines. Those are in conflict. For example. You think?

But the regulators here are completely conflicted because HHS, the Department of Health and Human Services, is the department of the federal government in which you have the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, all of the health agencies, okay? And it is responsible for promoting vaccines. So it's responsible for the safety of vaccines and promoting vaccines. Those are in conflict. For example. You think?

But the regulators here are completely conflicted because HHS, the Department of Health and Human Services, is the department of the federal government in which you have the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, all of the health agencies, okay? And it is responsible for promoting vaccines. So it's responsible for the safety of vaccines and promoting vaccines. Those are in conflict. For example. You think?

For example, the Department of Transportation is responsible for promoting transportation. So they go to the airlines and they say, hey, make more planes, get more planes in the sky, have more airports, you know, and so forth. But who's responsible for safety if there's a crash? The NTSB, a completely different agency. You separate them. It's hard for me to shake your hand with industry.

For example, the Department of Transportation is responsible for promoting transportation. So they go to the airlines and they say, hey, make more planes, get more planes in the sky, have more airports, you know, and so forth. But who's responsible for safety if there's a crash? The NTSB, a completely different agency. You separate them. It's hard for me to shake your hand with industry.

For example, the Department of Transportation is responsible for promoting transportation. So they go to the airlines and they say, hey, make more planes, get more planes in the sky, have more airports, you know, and so forth. But who's responsible for safety if there's a crash? The NTSB, a completely different agency. You separate them. It's hard for me to shake your hand with industry.

I'm the government. I say, hey, make more planes. And at the same time, slap you and say, hey, it's hard to do the same role. So you separate. Or the Department of Energy is responsible for promoting nuclear power in America. But there's an atomic energy, the nuclear regulatory agency, excuse me, yeah, thank you, is responsible for the safety of nuclear power plants.

I'm the government. I say, hey, make more planes. And at the same time, slap you and say, hey, it's hard to do the same role. So you separate. Or the Department of Energy is responsible for promoting nuclear power in America. But there's an atomic energy, the nuclear regulatory agency, excuse me, yeah, thank you, is responsible for the safety of nuclear power plants.

I'm the government. I say, hey, make more planes. And at the same time, slap you and say, hey, it's hard to do the same role. So you separate. Or the Department of Energy is responsible for promoting nuclear power in America. But there's an atomic energy, the nuclear regulatory agency, excuse me, yeah, thank you, is responsible for the safety of nuclear power plants.

They completely separate this function with vaccines. They're not separated. And additionally, not only do they not separate those absolutely diametrically opposed duties, you cannot have the same department responsible for both. One will win out. More than that, remember what I told you earlier.

They completely separate this function with vaccines. They're not separated. And additionally, not only do they not separate those absolutely diametrically opposed duties, you cannot have the same department responsible for both. One will win out. More than that, remember what I told you earlier.

They completely separate this function with vaccines. They're not separated. And additionally, not only do they not separate those absolutely diametrically opposed duties, you cannot have the same department responsible for both. One will win out. More than that, remember what I told you earlier.

The 1986 act that I referenced did create a very narrow path for some compensation if you're vaccine injured. But you sue the Department of Health and Human Services, the secretary. You are suing the very same federal health department that is responsible for safety. So if, and they're represented by a little law firm called the Department of Justice. You might've heard of them, okay?

The 1986 act that I referenced did create a very narrow path for some compensation if you're vaccine injured. But you sue the Department of Health and Human Services, the secretary. You are suing the very same federal health department that is responsible for safety. So if, and they're represented by a little law firm called the Department of Justice. You might've heard of them, okay?

The 1986 act that I referenced did create a very narrow path for some compensation if you're vaccine injured. But you sue the Department of Health and Human Services, the secretary. You are suing the very same federal health department that is responsible for safety. So if, and they're represented by a little law firm called the Department of Justice. You might've heard of them, okay?

So you're fighting against the Department of Justice in this program where there's no discovery. Let's put that aside. The important point is this. It is the only product that I know of where the government defends the product and the industry and the companies against the consumer and the citizens. And that creates an incredible conflict. So if they do any study, Tucker, think about it.