Aaron Siri

They wrote back with that one study, that one study that I just told you about. We wrote back another letter saying, this study is total garbage. We explained why it's garbage. You know, as I told you, I, you know, one of the things that I do is I depose vaccinologists. It's part of what I do in infectious disease doctors and immunologists.

They wrote back with that one study, that one study that I just told you about. We wrote back another letter saying, this study is total garbage. We explained why it's garbage. You know, as I told you, I, you know, one of the things that I do is I depose vaccinologists. It's part of what I do in infectious disease doctors and immunologists.

So I have to learn epidemiology, you know, statistics, vaccinology, immunology. I mean, you know, that's part of what deposing experts requires you to do, okay? I don't, again, I don't have any degrees, but I have to learn this stuff. And I can tell you that that study design, it categorically is designed to reach the conclusion that they wanted.

So I have to learn epidemiology, you know, statistics, vaccinology, immunology. I mean, you know, that's part of what deposing experts requires you to do, okay? I don't, again, I don't have any degrees, but I have to learn this stuff. And I can tell you that that study design, it categorically is designed to reach the conclusion that they wanted.

So I have to learn epidemiology, you know, statistics, vaccinology, immunology. I mean, you know, that's part of what deposing experts requires you to do, okay? I don't, again, I don't have any degrees, but I have to learn this stuff. And I can tell you that that study design, it categorically is designed to reach the conclusion that they wanted.

And because it's a clearance process I described, if something had shown a different result, it just wouldn't have made it through. So yes, it is the perversion of science. Going all the way back to your actual question now, CDC is a policy entity. HHS is a policy entity. And to your point, why wouldn't the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program work? Now, finally going to answer your question.

And because it's a clearance process I described, if something had shown a different result, it just wouldn't have made it through. So yes, it is the perversion of science. Going all the way back to your actual question now, CDC is a policy entity. HHS is a policy entity. And to your point, why wouldn't the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program work? Now, finally going to answer your question.

And because it's a clearance process I described, if something had shown a different result, it just wouldn't have made it through. So yes, it is the perversion of science. Going all the way back to your actual question now, CDC is a policy entity. HHS is a policy entity. And to your point, why wouldn't the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program work? Now, finally going to answer your question.

That was a long road to get there because it's a policy organization. And yeah, of course, what the policy of that organization is, vaccines are safe and effective. That's a mantra. I don't know what that means entirely, by the way, but they say it all day long. And anything that shows they're unsafe will get people to not vaccinate, and that goes against their policy. So absolutely, they are-

That was a long road to get there because it's a policy organization. And yeah, of course, what the policy of that organization is, vaccines are safe and effective. That's a mantra. I don't know what that means entirely, by the way, but they say it all day long. And anything that shows they're unsafe will get people to not vaccinate, and that goes against their policy. So absolutely, they are-

That was a long road to get there because it's a policy organization. And yeah, of course, what the policy of that organization is, vaccines are safe and effective. That's a mantra. I don't know what that means entirely, by the way, but they say it all day long. And anything that shows they're unsafe will get people to not vaccinate, and that goes against their policy. So absolutely, they are-

Well, after law school, I clerked for the chief judge of the Supreme Court of Israel for a year after law school. And after that, I worked for Latham & Watkins, which is one of the biggest firms in the world for almost six years, doing bet-the-company litigation, right? Multi-billion dollar disputes. And then I left there. and started my own practice. I wasn't home enough.

Well, after law school, I clerked for the chief judge of the Supreme Court of Israel for a year after law school. And after that, I worked for Latham & Watkins, which is one of the biggest firms in the world for almost six years, doing bet-the-company litigation, right? Multi-billion dollar disputes. And then I left there. and started my own practice. I wasn't home enough.

Well, after law school, I clerked for the chief judge of the Supreme Court of Israel for a year after law school. And after that, I worked for Latham & Watkins, which is one of the biggest firms in the world for almost six years, doing bet-the-company litigation, right? Multi-billion dollar disputes. And then I left there. and started my own practice. I wasn't home enough.

I wanted to see my kids more and my wife more. So my own practice. And I continued to do commercial litigation, actually. That's what I kept doing. But instead of doing multi-billion dollar cases, we would do a few million dollars or A few hundred million dollar, a few hundred million dollar cases.

I wanted to see my kids more and my wife more. So my own practice. And I continued to do commercial litigation, actually. That's what I kept doing. But instead of doing multi-billion dollar cases, we would do a few million dollars or A few hundred million dollar, a few hundred million dollar cases.

I wanted to see my kids more and my wife more. So my own practice. And I continued to do commercial litigation, actually. That's what I kept doing. But instead of doing multi-billion dollar cases, we would do a few million dollars or A few hundred million dollar, a few hundred million dollar cases.

You know, there are some cases, for example, that, for example, Latham would have or a big firm would have, and they're doing a giant bankruptcy and they can't do a litigation, right? They can't do the litigation because it conflicts with the bankruptcy, but they don't want a different big firm to do that litigation, right? because they might steal a client.

You know, there are some cases, for example, that, for example, Latham would have or a big firm would have, and they're doing a giant bankruptcy and they can't do a litigation, right? They can't do the litigation because it conflicts with the bankruptcy, but they don't want a different big firm to do that litigation, right? because they might steal a client.

You know, there are some cases, for example, that, for example, Latham would have or a big firm would have, and they're doing a giant bankruptcy and they can't do a litigation, right? They can't do the litigation because it conflicts with the bankruptcy, but they don't want a different big firm to do that litigation, right? because they might steal a client.