Arthur Aidala

And she goes on to say we came across a tip that would appear to be an alternate suspect. We're trying to work through that as rapidly as we can. And Judge Hipler said he would set a May deadline for the defense to present evidence of an alternate suspect. So why are they doing that? Why is she showing them?

And she goes on to say we came across a tip that would appear to be an alternate suspect. We're trying to work through that as rapidly as we can. And Judge Hipler said he would set a May deadline for the defense to present evidence of an alternate suspect. So why are they doing that? Why is she showing them?

You know, whenever I'm on a Michael Connelly tear right now reading all his legal thrillers, what? The defense, aren't they supposed to surprise the prosecution with something like this? What I like, you have to disclose every card you're going to play at trial.

You know, whenever I'm on a Michael Connelly tear right now reading all his legal thrillers, what? The defense, aren't they supposed to surprise the prosecution with something like this? What I like, you have to disclose every card you're going to play at trial.

You know, whenever I'm on a Michael Connelly tear right now reading all his legal thrillers, what? The defense, aren't they supposed to surprise the prosecution with something like this? What I like, you have to disclose every card you're going to play at trial.

Sometimes you do, Megan. I mean, when it comes to experts, especially when it comes to experts, in New York, there's a very strict requirement because you play the game of the experts. You've got to let them know who your expert is and give them an offer of proof, basically, about what they're going to testify. And then they get to go get their own expert to contradict what your expert is saying.

Sometimes you do, Megan. I mean, when it comes to experts, especially when it comes to experts, in New York, there's a very strict requirement because you play the game of the experts. You've got to let them know who your expert is and give them an offer of proof, basically, about what they're going to testify. And then they get to go get their own expert to contradict what your expert is saying.

Sometimes you do, Megan. I mean, when it comes to experts, especially when it comes to experts, in New York, there's a very strict requirement because you play the game of the experts. You've got to let them know who your expert is and give them an offer of proof, basically, about what they're going to testify. And then they get to go get their own expert to contradict what your expert is saying.

I mean, it usually doesn't hold true for private investigators. But if you're introducing a whole new theory to the case, You may not be obligated under the law to do that, but a judge usually doesn't like to get caught by surprise.

I mean, it usually doesn't hold true for private investigators. But if you're introducing a whole new theory to the case, You may not be obligated under the law to do that, but a judge usually doesn't like to get caught by surprise.

I mean, it usually doesn't hold true for private investigators. But if you're introducing a whole new theory to the case, You may not be obligated under the law to do that, but a judge usually doesn't like to get caught by surprise.

So I don't know if that particular jurisdiction... I can tell you, for an alibi witness, if you're in New York, if you're saying, my guy wasn't at the scene, he was in Rhode Island at the time that it took place. Which he is. There's a certain amount of time where you have to say, my client was not there and they were elsewhere. She did that.

So I don't know if that particular jurisdiction... I can tell you, for an alibi witness, if you're in New York, if you're saying, my guy wasn't at the scene, he was in Rhode Island at the time that it took place. Which he is. There's a certain amount of time where you have to say, my client was not there and they were elsewhere. She did that.

So I don't know if that particular jurisdiction... I can tell you, for an alibi witness, if you're in New York, if you're saying, my guy wasn't at the scene, he was in Rhode Island at the time that it took place. Which he is. There's a certain amount of time where you have to say, my client was not there and they were elsewhere. She did that.

She alleged he was out stargazing that night. It was just a lovely night for stargazing, and that was their, quote, alibi. Here's the other point in this case, Mark. The defense moved to bar the prosecution from using the terms psychopath and sociopath before the jurors. They actually also didn't want the prosecution to use the term murderer there.

She alleged he was out stargazing that night. It was just a lovely night for stargazing, and that was their, quote, alibi. Here's the other point in this case, Mark. The defense moved to bar the prosecution from using the terms psychopath and sociopath before the jurors. They actually also didn't want the prosecution to use the term murderer there.

She alleged he was out stargazing that night. It was just a lovely night for stargazing, and that was their, quote, alibi. Here's the other point in this case, Mark. The defense moved to bar the prosecution from using the terms psychopath and sociopath before the jurors. They actually also didn't want the prosecution to use the term murderer there.

The judge left open the possibility that the prosecution could use the word murderer during closing arguments, but I think is still considering on psychopath or sociopath. But what kind of motion is this? Since when can the prosecution not say he's a murderer? That's what we're all doing here.

The judge left open the possibility that the prosecution could use the word murderer during closing arguments, but I think is still considering on psychopath or sociopath. But what kind of motion is this? Since when can the prosecution not say he's a murderer? That's what we're all doing here.

The judge left open the possibility that the prosecution could use the word murderer during closing arguments, but I think is still considering on psychopath or sociopath. But what kind of motion is this? Since when can the prosecution not say he's a murderer? That's what we're all doing here.