Candace Owens

Hier sind sie. Und ich werde durch die Sprache hier gehen, die sie in jedem dieser Begriffe wiederholt. Wir haben die erste Ursache der Aktion, die sie als sexuelle Verbrechung bezeichnet, die in Verbrechung von Titel 7 ist. Und sie sagt, dass sie gegen discriminiert wurde.

In violation of Title VII, she was subjected to harassment and creating a hostile work environment on the basis of her sex and gender. She goes on to say that she has suffered and continues to suffer substantial damages, including but not limited to severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish.

In violation of Title VII, she was subjected to harassment and creating a hostile work environment on the basis of her sex and gender. She goes on to say that she has suffered and continues to suffer substantial damages, including but not limited to severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish.

In violation of Title VII, she was subjected to harassment and creating a hostile work environment on the basis of her sex and gender. She goes on to say that she has suffered and continues to suffer substantial damages, including but not limited to severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish.

and is therefore entitled to an award of punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. Okay. Second cause of action. That was for retaliation in violation of Title VII. She claims that it was an unlawful employment practice for any employer to discriminate against an employee because she opposed their practices that were forbidden under Title VII. So she goes on. Vielen Dank.

and is therefore entitled to an award of punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. Okay. Second cause of action. That was for retaliation in violation of Title VII. She claims that it was an unlawful employment practice for any employer to discriminate against an employee because she opposed their practices that were forbidden under Title VII. So she goes on. Vielen Dank.

and is therefore entitled to an award of punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial. Okay. Second cause of action. That was for retaliation in violation of Title VII. She claims that it was an unlawful employment practice for any employer to discriminate against an employee because she opposed their practices that were forbidden under Title VII. So she goes on. Vielen Dank.

And you have the third cause of action. She mentions it again. Exact same language. She wants those damages to be proven at a time in trial. In the fourth cause of action, she lists it again, that she continues to suffer substantial damages, including but not limited to severe emotional distress, pain and humiliation. The fifth cause of action.

And you have the third cause of action. She mentions it again. Exact same language. She wants those damages to be proven at a time in trial. In the fourth cause of action, she lists it again, that she continues to suffer substantial damages, including but not limited to severe emotional distress, pain and humiliation. The fifth cause of action.

And you have the third cause of action. She mentions it again. Exact same language. She wants those damages to be proven at a time in trial. In the fourth cause of action, she lists it again, that she continues to suffer substantial damages, including but not limited to severe emotional distress, pain and humiliation. The fifth cause of action.

This was retaliation in violation of the Californian Labor Code. She again repeats. dass sie verletzt wurde und deshalb für ihre schweren emotionalen Schmerzen und Schmerzen bezahlt werden muss. In der sechsten Anlage listet sie es wieder. Sie beurteilt sie, dass sie es verletzt hat, die verletzten Verletzungen zu beurteilen.

This was retaliation in violation of the Californian Labor Code. She again repeats. dass sie verletzt wurde und deshalb für ihre schweren emotionalen Schmerzen und Schmerzen bezahlt werden muss. In der sechsten Anlage listet sie es wieder. Sie beurteilt sie, dass sie es verletzt hat, die verletzten Verletzungen zu beurteilen.

This was retaliation in violation of the Californian Labor Code. She again repeats. dass sie verletzt wurde und deshalb für ihre schweren emotionalen Schmerzen und Schmerzen bezahlt werden muss. In der sechsten Anlage listet sie es wieder. Sie beurteilt sie, dass sie es verletzt hat, die verletzten Verletzungen zu beurteilen.

Aber natürlich, weil sie durch das gelebt hat, will sie, dass sie für die schweren emotionalen Schmerzen bezahlt wird. Nun, ich sage, es wird nicht in der siebten Anlage erwähnt, It is not mentioned in the eighth cause of action and it is not mentioned in the ninth cause of action. Skyler, if you go back to the list of the actions, I can just show them.

Aber natürlich, weil sie durch das gelebt hat, will sie, dass sie für die schweren emotionalen Schmerzen bezahlt wird. Nun, ich sage, es wird nicht in der siebten Anlage erwähnt, It is not mentioned in the eighth cause of action and it is not mentioned in the ninth cause of action. Skyler, if you go back to the list of the actions, I can just show them.

Aber natürlich, weil sie durch das gelebt hat, will sie, dass sie für die schweren emotionalen Schmerzen bezahlt wird. Nun, ich sage, es wird nicht in der siebten Anlage erwähnt, It is not mentioned in the eighth cause of action and it is not mentioned in the ninth cause of action. Skyler, if you go back to the list of the actions, I can just show them.

So it's not mentioned in three of the 13 causes of action. Seven, eight and nine. She does not say that she was emotionally distressed and therefore deserving of money. Then she jumps right back into it in 10 and 11. Now, these are the most notable ones because she's just dropped these, okay?

So it's not mentioned in three of the 13 causes of action. Seven, eight and nine. She does not say that she was emotionally distressed and therefore deserving of money. Then she jumps right back into it in 10 and 11. Now, these are the most notable ones because she's just dropped these, okay?

So it's not mentioned in three of the 13 causes of action. Seven, eight and nine. She does not say that she was emotionally distressed and therefore deserving of money. Then she jumps right back into it in 10 and 11. Now, these are the most notable ones because she's just dropped these, okay?

The intentional infliction of emotional distress, that's the 10th cause of action, and the 11th cause of action, which is negligence. Because of their negligence, they inflicted emotional distress upon her. She has now dropped those two claims, okay?