Craig Boardman

But rule 413 in the federal system, and remember I told you, normally you cannot get into someone's prior bad acts. 413. Similar crimes in sexual assault cases. In a criminal case in which a defendant is accused of sexual assault, the court may admit evidence that the defendant committed another sexual assault. The evidence may be considered on any matter of which it is relevant.

But rule 413 in the federal system, and remember I told you, normally you cannot get into someone's prior bad acts. 413. Similar crimes in sexual assault cases. In a criminal case in which a defendant is accused of sexual assault, the court may admit evidence that the defendant committed another sexual assault. The evidence may be considered on any matter of which it is relevant.

So if the prosecutors, maybe some of the, and we don't know because they haven't told us, but maybe some of this 404B evidence, and we know there's been allegations, are other sexual assaults that Diddy has committed. And even though that would be prior bad acts normally in the federal system, that can come in.

So if the prosecutors, maybe some of the, and we don't know because they haven't told us, but maybe some of this 404B evidence, and we know there's been allegations, are other sexual assaults that Diddy has committed. And even though that would be prior bad acts normally in the federal system, that can come in.

So if the prosecutors, maybe some of the, and we don't know because they haven't told us, but maybe some of this 404B evidence, and we know there's been allegations, are other sexual assaults that Diddy has committed. And even though that would be prior bad acts normally in the federal system, that can come in.

The great prosecutors in the United States will build their case slowly, painfully, brick by brick. They will not rush. This six weeks is not going to be some jaw-dropping, shocking evidence. It's going to be bit by bit by bit by bit. It's like the death of a thousand cuts. And so what they'll do is they'll talk about his past. They'll talk about his history.

The great prosecutors in the United States will build their case slowly, painfully, brick by brick. They will not rush. This six weeks is not going to be some jaw-dropping, shocking evidence. It's going to be bit by bit by bit by bit. It's like the death of a thousand cuts. And so what they'll do is they'll talk about his past. They'll talk about his history.

The great prosecutors in the United States will build their case slowly, painfully, brick by brick. They will not rush. This six weeks is not going to be some jaw-dropping, shocking evidence. It's going to be bit by bit by bit by bit. It's like the death of a thousand cuts. And so what they'll do is they'll talk about his past. They'll talk about his history.

Und wir haben eine klarere Idee, wann das jetzt beginnen wird. Sie sagen, 5. Mai für die Jury-Selektion, 12. Mai für die Eröffnungsstatements. Und wir werden mit Ihnen berichten, wie es passiert.

Und wir haben eine klarere Idee, wann das jetzt beginnen wird. Sie sagen, 5. Mai für die Jury-Selektion, 12. Mai für die Eröffnungsstatements. Und wir werden mit Ihnen berichten, wie es passiert.

Und wir haben eine klarere Idee, wann das jetzt beginnen wird. Sie sagen, 5. Mai für die Jury-Selektion, 12. Mai für die Eröffnungsstatements. Und wir werden mit Ihnen berichten, wie es passiert.

In the law we have this little thing we call prejudice versus probative. And so probative means it actually adds and helps the trier of fact, the jury, get information. Prejudice means it's just prejudicial. It doesn't help at all. It 100% has probative value.

In the law we have this little thing we call prejudice versus probative. And so probative means it actually adds and helps the trier of fact, the jury, get information. Prejudice means it's just prejudicial. It doesn't help at all. It 100% has probative value.

In the law we have this little thing we call prejudice versus probative. And so probative means it actually adds and helps the trier of fact, the jury, get information. Prejudice means it's just prejudicial. It doesn't help at all. It 100% has probative value.

I mean, that's what that is basically saying. But the question is, it's very strange to say, we will drop this lawsuit if you don't agree to go forward. The question is, why? What are we getting out of it? And I think that's what we're missing. Usually you say, I'll do something if you give me something. I'm not seeing what the victim would have gotten out of that.

I mean, that's what that is basically saying. But the question is, it's very strange to say, we will drop this lawsuit if you don't agree to go forward. The question is, why? What are we getting out of it? And I think that's what we're missing. Usually you say, I'll do something if you give me something. I'm not seeing what the victim would have gotten out of that.

I mean, that's what that is basically saying. But the question is, it's very strange to say, we will drop this lawsuit if you don't agree to go forward. The question is, why? What are we getting out of it? And I think that's what we're missing. Usually you say, I'll do something if you give me something. I'm not seeing what the victim would have gotten out of that.

So that's the weird issue on this, because they're not saying that small part. So it's just like, why did they enter into this backroom deal that nobody has heard about?

So that's the weird issue on this, because they're not saying that small part. So it's just like, why did they enter into this backroom deal that nobody has heard about?

So that's the weird issue on this, because they're not saying that small part. So it's just like, why did they enter into this backroom deal that nobody has heard about?