David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)

And I think that's a credible argument that they can make because there's been testimony, again, from multiple individuals that he was high a lot of the times, that he punched and kicked Cassidy and was very mean to her and very cruel to her. And so that video that was presented from the hotel, that would show that as well.

And I think that's a credible argument that they can make because there's been testimony, again, from multiple individuals that he was high a lot of the times, that he punched and kicked Cassidy and was very mean to her and very cruel to her. And so that video that was presented from the hotel, that would show that as well.

So I think that goes towards the defense's argument, really, that this is a domestic violence issue. It's not a federal issue.

So I think that goes towards the defense's argument, really, that this is a domestic violence issue. It's not a federal issue.

You know... I take them with a grain of salt. And the government, I don't think, had a choice but to call this expert. And I thought she testified somewhat credibly. The problem is where you have these actions from Cassie and her testimony is what it is. You can have this expert saying all day, hey, look, it's emotional abuse that she had.

You know... I take them with a grain of salt. And the government, I don't think, had a choice but to call this expert. And I thought she testified somewhat credibly. The problem is where you have these actions from Cassie and her testimony is what it is. You can have this expert saying all day, hey, look, it's emotional abuse that she had.

And it's almost like a Stockholm syndrome where you can't get away from your captor and you fall in love with your captor. And that's what they're kind of portraying Cassie as, but the evidence that came out through cross-examination from Cassie, I don't think it's going to help that expert's testimony. And look, the defense is definitely going to have their own expert.

And it's almost like a Stockholm syndrome where you can't get away from your captor and you fall in love with your captor. And that's what they're kind of portraying Cassie as, but the evidence that came out through cross-examination from Cassie, I don't think it's going to help that expert's testimony. And look, the defense is definitely going to have their own expert.

I would assume who will testify that there wasn't this dependence on Diddy. And then when you have competing experts, really a lot of times what's going to happen is they're going to cancel each other out. So the jury, in my opinion, Once they hear from the other one, which I assume they will eventually, they'll cancel each other out.

I would assume who will testify that there wasn't this dependence on Diddy. And then when you have competing experts, really a lot of times what's going to happen is they're going to cancel each other out. So the jury, in my opinion, Once they hear from the other one, which I assume they will eventually, they'll cancel each other out.

And then the jury is going to say, all right, well, we don't care about the experts anymore. We're going back to square one. And that's Cassie.

And then the jury is going to say, all right, well, we don't care about the experts anymore. We're going back to square one. And that's Cassie.

It's the government who has to prove all of this, not Diddy, not his defense team. And the government has to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. So, again, when you're having all these thoughts and saying, well, all right, it may have happened, but we're not 100%, that's perfect reasonable doubt right there. And the defense is just eating that up.

It's the government who has to prove all of this, not Diddy, not his defense team. And the government has to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. So, again, when you're having all these thoughts and saying, well, all right, it may have happened, but we're not 100%, that's perfect reasonable doubt right there. And the defense is just eating that up.

It probably is good for him because it humanizes him a little bit. It's very difficult for this particular jury, I'm sure, to assimilate to Diddy, to, you know, say, oh, yeah, we're just like him. Of course you're not like Diddy. Diddy is trying to, you know, kind of make it so that they can look at each other, you know, kind of eye to eye that we have some similarities. You know, look at him.

It probably is good for him because it humanizes him a little bit. It's very difficult for this particular jury, I'm sure, to assimilate to Diddy, to, you know, say, oh, yeah, we're just like him. Of course you're not like Diddy. Diddy is trying to, you know, kind of make it so that they can look at each other, you know, kind of eye to eye that we have some similarities. You know, look at him.

He has gray hair now, which I think that probably is something that was a calculated move on Diddy's part or his defense team's part because it may show that He's not this violent guy who ordered all these attacks and and freak offs and all. You know, he's just a he's just like us.

He has gray hair now, which I think that probably is something that was a calculated move on Diddy's part or his defense team's part because it may show that He's not this violent guy who ordered all these attacks and and freak offs and all. You know, he's just a he's just like us.

You know, he has gray hair by him blowing kisses to his family and, you know, saying, how are you doing and whatnot and being somewhat jovial, if you will. I think that's probably good for him. I don't think it's going to hurt him at all with the jury. Is it going to help in the end? I mean, again, maybe a little.

You know, he has gray hair by him blowing kisses to his family and, you know, saying, how are you doing and whatnot and being somewhat jovial, if you will. I think that's probably good for him. I don't think it's going to hurt him at all with the jury. Is it going to help in the end? I mean, again, maybe a little.