Dr. Randy Bach
speaker
79 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Mar 2025
last heard Mar 2025
Dr. Randy Bach’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
That was me. I apologize. There we are. Now you're in. Thank you so much, Dr. Drew. I had myself muted so I wouldn't step on anybody's toes during the excellent Tom Renz interview. Thank you so much for that.
Tell me about it. I think it's a topic that, yeah, I'd love that. I mean, you're far more expert on these topics than I am, but I think I try to bring kind of an outsider perspective to whatever I do. It doesn't always work at home. I mean, my wife expects me to have insider respect with our marriage, but for many other things I try to do.
Yeah, you mentioned the null hypothesis, and I actually used that term just earlier today. I was communicating with Dr. Nicholas Christakis, MD, PhD, maybe MA, I don't know. He's a multi-credentialed guy, a professor. He kind of got attacked by the woke mob in 2015 at Yale University, near and dear to my heart. I remember this. Yeah.
And so we had a little bit of communique because I had written an article recently in Brownstone for whom I write regularly. And thank you, Jeffrey Tucker. And it was about, you know, kind of China 2020, all that kind of stuff. And I, you know, I'd made a judgment about what he had written. Anyway, long story short. he wrote back recently that he's going to look into the Zika thing himself.
But I was using the null hypothesis concept with him that you really just can't look at the Zika phenomenon. You have to kind of look at it with an open mind. And that's what I think people don't do enough of with a lot of these things.
That's a great point. You know, science gets applied to a lot of things. I mean, I know lots of my, you know, contemporaries, kids, you know, are studying political science. And maybe there's some science to that, and there's social science. But science, you know, kind of has two terms. I mean, there's the body of knowledge. Science, you know, refers to knowledge like conscience and whatnot.
But there's also the collection process, which has to, you know, fall under kind of reproducibility. You know, there's this gravity thing. And every time I drop this, it'll happen over and over again, unless there's a strong wind. You know, this is pretty much reproducible, improvable. But not many things wind up having that kind of rigor of reproducibility.
I was just speaking with Jacob Rich, who writes for Reason. There's a tongue twister there. And he was talking about, you know, he's been going over a lot of these kind of meta-analytic studies. And, you know, it's GIGO, garbage in, garbage out. People have, you know, the answers they want, and then they put stuff in, and they wind up getting, you know, whatever they can kind of come out with,
And I think you pointed that to the first part of this interview, when you're talking about kind of parsing out, you know, death data, because people put in what they want to at the time. And you really, you know, it's kind of like trying to untangle, you know, the spaghetti. It's harder, you know, it's easy at the beginning, it's hard at the end. It's all mixed up together.
And these things, you know, kind of get... But, you know, I don't want to divert from our time here.
So, simply as possible. So you're going to have to specify the question a little bit for me. The military aspect of COVID, military aspect of controlling health.
Well, the thing that got me interested in this aspect, I've been writing for Mr. Tucker for quite some time now. And I wrote a few different articles on Dr. Fauci and kind of the moment. I think both he and I are interested in the moment.
that Donald Trump turned from somebody reasonably rational about COVID as a bad flu without say a flu shot in advance into somebody that saw this as a bioweapon. And there's a lot kind of written on this topic. I don't think as much of it's kind of generally known, but right around the Ides of March, not too far from where we are, March 13th or so, Trump kind of came in like spring and winter.
He came in like a lamb, he left like a lion. He kind of closed, locked everything down after proclaiming quite the opposite prior to that. And, you know, people trying to, you know, recollect the records show that there were, you know, aspects of this that were, you know, referred to the military.
And a lot of the COVID, you know, Operation Warp Speed, a lot of the responses that happened, you know, had military fingerprints on. So they, you know, a lot of these things were done under security directives. I'm not particularly expert on that. But what I have been working on is kind of like the ancillary aspects of how things were promulgated and kept forward on a kind of a high heat level.
And in a sense to kind of satisfy a little bit of the emergency statutes. I mean, the fact that we had kind of this emergency use authorization, the nation was under emergency, had a military aspect to it. And, you know, what we wound up seeing was, you know, kind of the forbearance of interim therapeutics.
You know, if we had been like for HIV, just waiting for a vaccine, you know, we'd be waiting, you know, 30, 40 years later for that vaccine. Therapeutics have a clear role in, you know, dangerous viruses and emergent virus and so forth. And we did not do that. We abjured doing that in order to keep the pressure on to have the emergency use put on.
The article, you know, I've written a few articles recently on kind of this ancillary aspect of the kind of militarization of health. And so the most recent article on this topic is called, it's really prosaic, it's ASPR and BARDA. which are two organizations under HHS, bureaucratic dysfunction and biodefense. So what we have here is a world, frankly, of Dr. Fauci's devising.
After the 2001, I don't want to get too deep in the weeds here, but 2001, it was 9-11. And then people may remember this thing, Amerithrax. It was this anthrax spreading, and it went to politicians and whatnot. And after that, the culmination of that was basically kind of the...
The expansion, frankly, the doubling of Dr. Fauci's realm and regime, and his salary, he went from kind of $200,000 to almost $500,000. He remained the highest paid employee. People wonder why. Is he there for a while? No, because he basically did a military operation. He took over, basically duplicated the DOD's biodefense weapon industry.
Showing 1–20 of 79 · page 1 of 4
Next →