Jefferson Morley
speaker
178 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Jan 2025
last heard Mar 2025
Jefferson Morley’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
So that alone is kind of indisputable factual evidence of a deficiency at a minimum in the official story. So also, I think, you know, in the long and I'm not an expert on RFK assassination, but when you see how CIA assassination operations worked and the kind of techniques that they used, you can't rule out that Sirhan was under some kind of mind control program.
I mean, they had a mind control program, and it was designed to do things like this. Commit an act, and you have no memory of it. So we know they were working on that technology. Could it have been applied here? That's why we need the records, so that we can assess, is that a real possibility?
Yeah. I mean, it's a striking detail.
Yeah. I mean, the the problem that they have is that. I don't have a conspiracy theory. So the label of conspiracy theorist just doesn't apply. And the other thing is, you know, nobody can deny the stuff that I'm talking about. Let me mention another JFK document that's very important and I think will interest you.
One of the things that's withheld and is in the JFK collection right now is the testimony of James Angleton in 1975 to the church committee about the Israeli nuclear program. This is a 113-page document, and it's heavily redacted to this day, and the redactions clearly pertain to Israel. Now, is this an assassination-related document? Absolutely.
The Assassination Records Review Board said this is an assassination-related document. It meets the statutory definition, okay? If the president and this effort are serious, that testimony will be declassified because Angleton controlled the Oswald file on the one hand, and he was in contact with the Israelis on the other. So it belongs in the public record.
That's another test of, is this serious effort?
Well, it relates to what Angleton was doing in 1963. There were profound conflicts between Israel and the Kennedy White House over the nuclear program. Kennedy was pressing for on-site inspections, which the Israelis resisted because On-site inspections would have realized that they had a bomb-making program.
So this was a real bone of contention between the Israeli government and the Kennedy administration in the summer of 1963, at a time when Engleton controlled the Oswald file. So just the juxtaposition of those facts means that everything about it should be on the public record.
Yeah.
I mean, it's very hard to tell sometimes from this testimony, given all the redactions. But yeah, that's, you know, was he secretly supporting Israel against JFK? That's one of the questions that needs to be answered by full disclosure.
Well, because in 1975, the CIA had been revealed to be running assassination programs, to be running a mind control program. to be spying on the anti-war movement, spying on Americans. So he was hauled before. And Congress, who was completely in the dark, had been duped or wanted to be duped. Suddenly, their eyes woke up.
And they had to explain to their constituents, hey, what have these guys been doing in our name? And so Angleton was called in. And this was all executive session testimony. So he was grilled about lots of things, about domestic spying, about the Israeli nuclear program. about the JFK assassination.
Interestingly enough, he was not questioned about Oswald because even the church committee did not know the extent of the pre-assassination surveillance of Oswald. That's only something we've learned since the 1990s.
Yeah, basically, he dropped the demand for on-site inspections. He dropped the demand that AIPAC be classified as a domestic lobby. And, you know, there was really no accountability after that. And the story only emerged, you know, 10 years later when the church committee started pressing Angleton for some explanations.
Yeah, and this is a tough call for the president because he's going to get very strong pushback from his national security apparatus supported by the CIA, supported by – Israeli interests to say, no, you can't talk about that. That's not permitted. You know, you can't don't do that.
Like I say, there's some very clear benchmarks to figure out. Is this working or not? And, you know, are people holding up the process and and obstructing the president's wishes or are they, you know, are they really going along? And so the proof is in the pudding. You know, the president's sentiment is great. It's great that a president has committed to this.
It's amazing that no president has committed in this way before. But we'll take it. I'm not I'm not a supporter of President Trump. But on this issue, he's absolutely right. And we need to follow through on what he said.
Showing 161–178 of 178 · page 9 of 9
← Previous