Kaizen Asiedu

Oh, okay, because I believe that if I say this view and it goes against the tribe, then I'm going to be excommunicated. Now I can see, okay, so what is this preventing me from even maybe admitting to myself about how I disagree with a tribe? So I think I'm not someone who believes that emotions are a bad thing. I think our lives are emotionally driven.

Like every logical goal that we have or every log, All goals are emotional in nature. We all want to experience something, and we use logic to help us achieve our emotional goals. So if at least we can acknowledge where we are emotionally, then we can see where maybe we have some logical fallacies to look at.

Like every logical goal that we have or every log, All goals are emotional in nature. We all want to experience something, and we use logic to help us achieve our emotional goals. So if at least we can acknowledge where we are emotionally, then we can see where maybe we have some logical fallacies to look at.

Like every logical goal that we have or every log, All goals are emotional in nature. We all want to experience something, and we use logic to help us achieve our emotional goals. So if at least we can acknowledge where we are emotionally, then we can see where maybe we have some logical fallacies to look at.

Absolutely. You know, what's interesting is that. We're living in such an algorithmic age. So even when you do disagree with someone, if your audience is generally leaning in one direction or another, when you disagree with someone, it doesn't get as much visibility as when you agree with them.

Absolutely. You know, what's interesting is that. We're living in such an algorithmic age. So even when you do disagree with someone, if your audience is generally leaning in one direction or another, when you disagree with someone, it doesn't get as much visibility as when you agree with them.

Absolutely. You know, what's interesting is that. We're living in such an algorithmic age. So even when you do disagree with someone, if your audience is generally leaning in one direction or another, when you disagree with someone, it doesn't get as much visibility as when you agree with them.

So for example, in the times that I have criticized Elon, I get like a fraction of the viewership on those. So even to the extent that I've criticized Elon or Trump, you probably don't see that as much. You see the stuff that my audience blows up because I'm generally more aligned with them. But yeah, there are several things. One, I...

So for example, in the times that I have criticized Elon, I get like a fraction of the viewership on those. So even to the extent that I've criticized Elon or Trump, you probably don't see that as much. You see the stuff that my audience blows up because I'm generally more aligned with them. But yeah, there are several things. One, I...

So for example, in the times that I have criticized Elon, I get like a fraction of the viewership on those. So even to the extent that I've criticized Elon or Trump, you probably don't see that as much. You see the stuff that my audience blows up because I'm generally more aligned with them. But yeah, there are several things. One, I...

I think a lot of their rhetoric lacks emotional grace and intelligence. And what I mean by that is I think they're directly right on a lot of stuff. I agree with what they're doing with those with dismantling bureaucracy.

I think a lot of their rhetoric lacks emotional grace and intelligence. And what I mean by that is I think they're directly right on a lot of stuff. I agree with what they're doing with those with dismantling bureaucracy.

I think a lot of their rhetoric lacks emotional grace and intelligence. And what I mean by that is I think they're directly right on a lot of stuff. I agree with what they're doing with those with dismantling bureaucracy.

I agree with what they're doing with removing some of the excesses of DEI, which sometimes was just masking race based quotas and affirmative action that was really damaging to social cohesion. I think a lot of what they have been doing with USAID, like shutting down a lot of what we're doing overseas has been really healthy.

I agree with what they're doing with removing some of the excesses of DEI, which sometimes was just masking race based quotas and affirmative action that was really damaging to social cohesion. I think a lot of what they have been doing with USAID, like shutting down a lot of what we're doing overseas has been really healthy.

I agree with what they're doing with removing some of the excesses of DEI, which sometimes was just masking race based quotas and affirmative action that was really damaging to social cohesion. I think a lot of what they have been doing with USAID, like shutting down a lot of what we're doing overseas has been really healthy.

But a lot of the time, I feel like their rhetoric is unnecessarily combative and dismissive of people who disagree with them. And I like to think that what people like about me is I don't feel dismissive of other perspectives. I like to show that I understand them, even if I disagree with them.

But a lot of the time, I feel like their rhetoric is unnecessarily combative and dismissive of people who disagree with them. And I like to think that what people like about me is I don't feel dismissive of other perspectives. I like to show that I understand them, even if I disagree with them.

But a lot of the time, I feel like their rhetoric is unnecessarily combative and dismissive of people who disagree with them. And I like to think that what people like about me is I don't feel dismissive of other perspectives. I like to show that I understand them, even if I disagree with them.

And I'd like to see that a bit more, a lot more from our commander in chief and Elon to an extent, too, because, you know, there are times where he's dunking on people on X and it's like, oh, this is just like unnecessary and actually just creating more, more division than there actually needs to be.