Kelly Hyman

Oh, this guy is dangerous. Another woman has now come forward alleging Combs of sexual assault. She claims she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Combs.

Oh, this guy is dangerous. Another woman has now come forward alleging Combs of sexual assault. She claims she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Combs.

Well, no one is above the law, but the state who brings the case has the burden of proof, the government. And so they must prove every single element of the cause of action. And then when someone brings a motion to dismiss, basically saying that you're asking the court to dismiss a case, to dismiss account of a case, and then you make legal argument.

Well, no one is above the law, but the state who brings the case has the burden of proof, the government. And so they must prove every single element of the cause of action. And then when someone brings a motion to dismiss, basically saying that you're asking the court to dismiss a case, to dismiss account of a case, and then you make legal argument.

But ultimately, the judge is going to look at the law because that's the key thing. Look at the law and based on the law and facts presented, whether this third cause of action should be ultimately dismissed.

But ultimately, the judge is going to look at the law because that's the key thing. Look at the law and based on the law and facts presented, whether this third cause of action should be ultimately dismissed.

Well, ultimately, that's going to be up to the judge to make that determination looking at the law. It's important to remember in the court of law that you are innocent till proven guilty. That is really important because since the government, the state brings the case, they have to make sure that they have substantial evidence for this. And one of the potential arguments for a motion to dismiss

Well, ultimately, that's going to be up to the judge to make that determination looking at the law. It's important to remember in the court of law that you are innocent till proven guilty. That is really important because since the government, the state brings the case, they have to make sure that they have substantial evidence for this. And one of the potential arguments for a motion to dismiss

legally is that they cannot prove their case, that they cannot prove the certain elements of the crime. Ultimately, we'll see what the judge does in this matter, whether to dismiss it or to say, no, this is going to go forward.

legally is that they cannot prove their case, that they cannot prove the certain elements of the crime. Ultimately, we'll see what the judge does in this matter, whether to dismiss it or to say, no, this is going to go forward.

But it's also important to remember from a legal standpoint that the other side, when someone files this, will have an opportunity to respond, will give them an opportunity in the court pleadings to make their argument why this count should not be dismissed.

But it's also important to remember from a legal standpoint that the other side, when someone files this, will have an opportunity to respond, will give them an opportunity in the court pleadings to make their argument why this count should not be dismissed.

The judge could potentially set a hearing, yes, in regard to this. Sometimes the judge will rule on the paper. And what that means is one side will file the motion to dismiss, the other side will respond to it, but possibly the other side will get a reply. In other words, a reply to the response And then the judge could set a hearing and have oral arguments.

The judge could potentially set a hearing, yes, in regard to this. Sometimes the judge will rule on the paper. And what that means is one side will file the motion to dismiss, the other side will respond to it, but possibly the other side will get a reply. In other words, a reply to the response And then the judge could set a hearing and have oral arguments.

And what that means from a legal perspective, the oral arguments is each side will get to stand up in front of the judge and make their arguments to the court, basically plead their case and say why the judge should rule accordingly.

And what that means from a legal perspective, the oral arguments is each side will get to stand up in front of the judge and make their arguments to the court, basically plead their case and say why the judge should rule accordingly.

Or the judge could look at the papers, look at the law that substantiates the different position, PDD's position, the state's position, the government's position, and then just rule on that and issue an order basically saying either, yes, I agree, this count should be dismissed, or no, it should not be dismissed.

Or the judge could look at the papers, look at the law that substantiates the different position, PDD's position, the state's position, the government's position, and then just rule on that and issue an order basically saying either, yes, I agree, this count should be dismissed, or no, it should not be dismissed.

So when you look at a class action, it's important to remember in a class action that there is one person that's kind of like the class representative. They're like the spokesperson, a person that speaks for the class. And then there's other peoples as well. One argument can be made from Diddy's standpoint that the people are not similarly situated.

So when you look at a class action, it's important to remember in a class action that there is one person that's kind of like the class representative. They're like the spokesperson, a person that speaks for the class. And then there's other peoples as well. One argument can be made from Diddy's standpoint that the people are not similarly situated.