Mark Zuckerberg

Well, I think there are a couple of different things here. One is this is something where I think X and Twitter just did it better than us on fact checking. We took the critique around fact checking, sorry, around misinformation. We put in place this fact checking program, which basically empowered these third party fact checkers.

Well, I think there are a couple of different things here. One is this is something where I think X and Twitter just did it better than us on fact checking. We took the critique around fact checking, sorry, around misinformation. We put in place this fact checking program, which basically empowered these third party fact checkers.

They can mark stuff false and then we would downright get in the algorithm. I think what Twitter and X have done with community notes, I think it's just a better program. Rather than having a small number of fact checkers, you get the whole community to weigh in.

They can mark stuff false and then we would downright get in the algorithm. I think what Twitter and X have done with community notes, I think it's just a better program. Rather than having a small number of fact checkers, you get the whole community to weigh in.

They can mark stuff false and then we would downright get in the algorithm. I think what Twitter and X have done with community notes, I think it's just a better program. Rather than having a small number of fact checkers, you get the whole community to weigh in.

When people usually disagree on something, tend to agree on how they're voting on a note, that's a good sign to the community that there's actually a broad consensus on this, and then you show it. And you're showing more information, not less. So you're not using the fact check as a signal to show less, you're using the community note to provide real context and show additional information.

When people usually disagree on something, tend to agree on how they're voting on a note, that's a good sign to the community that there's actually a broad consensus on this, and then you show it. And you're showing more information, not less. So you're not using the fact check as a signal to show less, you're using the community note to provide real context and show additional information.

When people usually disagree on something, tend to agree on how they're voting on a note, that's a good sign to the community that there's actually a broad consensus on this, and then you show it. And you're showing more information, not less. So you're not using the fact check as a signal to show less, you're using the community note to provide real context and show additional information.

So I think that that's better. For When you're talking about like nation states or people interfering, a lot of that stuff is best rooted out at the level of kind of accounts doing phony things. So you get like whether it's like China or Russia or Iran or like one of these countries, they'll set up these networks of fake accounts and bots.

So I think that that's better. For When you're talking about like nation states or people interfering, a lot of that stuff is best rooted out at the level of kind of accounts doing phony things. So you get like whether it's like China or Russia or Iran or like one of these countries, they'll set up these networks of fake accounts and bots.

So I think that that's better. For When you're talking about like nation states or people interfering, a lot of that stuff is best rooted out at the level of kind of accounts doing phony things. So you get like whether it's like China or Russia or Iran or like one of these countries, they'll set up these networks of fake accounts and bots.

And they coordinate and they post on each other's stuff to make it seem like it's authentic and kind of convince people. It's like, wow, a bunch of people must think this or something. And the way that you identify that is you build AI systems that can basically detect that those accounts are not behaving the way that a human would.

And they coordinate and they post on each other's stuff to make it seem like it's authentic and kind of convince people. It's like, wow, a bunch of people must think this or something. And the way that you identify that is you build AI systems that can basically detect that those accounts are not behaving the way that a human would.

And they coordinate and they post on each other's stuff to make it seem like it's authentic and kind of convince people. It's like, wow, a bunch of people must think this or something. And the way that you identify that is you build AI systems that can basically detect that those accounts are not behaving the way that a human would.

And when we find that, that there's like some bot that's operating an account.

And when we find that, that there's like some bot that's operating an account.

And when we find that, that there's like some bot that's operating an account.

There are some things that a person just would never do. Have you met Lex Friedman? Yes. He might not be. He might not pass your Turing test.

There are some things that a person just would never do. Have you met Lex Friedman? Yes. He might not be. He might not pass your Turing test.

There are some things that a person just would never do. Have you met Lex Friedman? Yes. He might not be. He might not pass your Turing test.