Matt

If you who are listening to this want more of Moira and Adrian, you should definitely go listen to their podcast, In Bed With The Right. It'll be linked in the description. And I'm so happy that you chose to listen to this podcast today. I hope that you are doing whatever you need to do to take care of yourself because we all need to see each other make it to the other side of this. And we will.

If you who are listening to this want more of Moira and Adrian, you should definitely go listen to their podcast, In Bed With The Right. It'll be linked in the description. And I'm so happy that you chose to listen to this podcast today. I hope that you are doing whatever you need to do to take care of yourself because we all need to see each other make it to the other side of this. And we will.

I love you so much. And until next time, stay fruity.

I love you so much. And until next time, stay fruity.

I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

Yeah, it's a tricky business, right? Because if you have to go after all these malefactors, then you have to look in a certain sense like you're going after your political enemies because your political enemies did commit serious wrongdoings of lawfare. So how do you deal with that? You have to both be just and appear to be just.

Yeah, it's a tricky business, right? Because if you have to go after all these malefactors, then you have to look in a certain sense like you're going after your political enemies because your political enemies did commit serious wrongdoings of lawfare. So how do you deal with that? You have to both be just and appear to be just.

And I think in one sense, part of what the Trump administration's doing, and I think you're seeing Pam Bondi do, I think you'll see Kash Patel do this, Emile Bove, who's working for Pam Bondi in the DOJ, I think there's a sort of politics of truth where they're going to be very honest, transparent, and forthcoming.

And I think in one sense, part of what the Trump administration's doing, and I think you're seeing Pam Bondi do, I think you'll see Kash Patel do this, Emile Bove, who's working for Pam Bondi in the DOJ, I think there's a sort of politics of truth where they're going to be very honest, transparent, and forthcoming.

But I also think that there has to be a kind of prosecutorial plan laid out about both prosecuting a certain kind of crime as a kind of thematic headliner, but also providing a kind of way out of lawfare, even for our political opponents.

But I also think that there has to be a kind of prosecutorial plan laid out about both prosecuting a certain kind of crime as a kind of thematic headliner, but also providing a kind of way out of lawfare, even for our political opponents.

Yeah, so I think a headliner is perjury. One of the things that lawfare needs in order to conspire and malign and attack and slander and destroy one's political opponents using legal mechanisms is sworn testimony. You have to be deposed under oath. You have to go before Congress under oath. You have to go into court under oath. You have to go before FISA courts under oath. And perjury is a crime.

Yeah, so I think a headliner is perjury. One of the things that lawfare needs in order to conspire and malign and attack and slander and destroy one's political opponents using legal mechanisms is sworn testimony. You have to be deposed under oath. You have to go before Congress under oath. You have to go into court under oath. You have to go before FISA courts under oath. And perjury is a crime.

Section 18 of the Federal Code, perjury is a crime of, you know, one to five years. And if you lie to a FISA court, if you perjure yourself there, it's 5 to 10. So it's a major issue if you wind up prosecuting it because it actually squeezes off the power of lawfare conspiracies. But it also has a kind of...

Section 18 of the Federal Code, perjury is a crime of, you know, one to five years. And if you lie to a FISA court, if you perjure yourself there, it's 5 to 10. So it's a major issue if you wind up prosecuting it because it actually squeezes off the power of lawfare conspiracies. But it also has a kind of...

powerful defense against the dangers of lawfare generally, which is you're basically trying to prosecute truth-telling, right? Or lying. Don't lie. We are a truthful political body. We are a people that is candid. We are a republic of self-governance. People have to do what they say and say what they do and do it in good faith.

powerful defense against the dangers of lawfare generally, which is you're basically trying to prosecute truth-telling, right? Or lying. Don't lie. We are a truthful political body. We are a people that is candid. We are a republic of self-governance. People have to do what they say and say what they do and do it in good faith.

That's in the language of the oath of the president and the vice president. Pam Bondi mentioned it in her hearings. This is what they have to rekindle. And so if you go after perjury, what you're basically saying is, yeah, we're going to go after some of our political opponents who perjured themselves and lied in various ways to malign their political enemies.

That's in the language of the oath of the president and the vice president. Pam Bondi mentioned it in her hearings. This is what they have to rekindle. And so if you go after perjury, what you're basically saying is, yeah, we're going to go after some of our political opponents who perjured themselves and lied in various ways to malign their political enemies.