Michael Lee
speaker
39 appearances
4 recordings
4 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Feb 2025
Michael Lee’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
I've got four of them living in my house. You know what I mean? Anybody that's got kids knows that, look, listen, if they're neurotypical with no – problems, medically, they're still really hard to deal with. It's stressful. We need breaks from them.
There's things that have to happen in order for us to keep our sanity and still maintain a healthy relationship with our kids and with our spouse and so forth and so on. And so when we see people that are inviting these things into their lives, I think we really do have to raise a big question mark there.
She starts making claims like, for instance, she stated at one point, epilepsy doesn't look like this. It looks like this other thing, you know? And, well, she's not a doctor, so you can't make a claim like that, right? But she's purporting herself, basically, like she plays that role on TV. And I'm telling you, epilepsy doesn't look like that, just so you know. It looks like this other thing.
Now, that's... Not as extreme a behavior because people will often think things. You know, they'll have their own perceptions of what things are supposed to be based on what they've heard.
But there's times that she really plays intentionally, like she is giving, she's saying a lot of real medical, heavy kind of literature lingo that she's throwing in the conversation to seem very, very knowledgeable, very, very. And that in and of itself presented itself in her statement commonly in a specific pattern. That pattern is what we like to call excessive non-relevant details.
So the investigators ask her a question. There's a specific answer they're looking for. Like, for instance, the question may be, so when did she get the AHC diagnosis, for example? And she doesn't answer that question.
she could say, oh, well, she got it in September of whatever year at this place, right? That's a direct answer. That's what we would expect a truthful person to do.
Instead, she takes us on this long journey where she has to predicate everything that she's about to say by taking us through this whole medical journey, and now she's throwing out medical lingo, and she's really kind of encapsulating this very, very muddy, confusing medical picture, in the way that she feels like it to us, like she answered that question. There was no answer in that.
The problem is, with these types of interviews, is that law enforcement are often doing these cold, like they're being brought into them with very little information or not all of the information. especially in homicide cases, they're, you know, typically they get called to a dead body, right? And they have to go in and, hey, did you do it? What happened here?
They're asking these kinds of questions. They don't really know the facts. And the idea there is to kind of like nail down a story. And, you know, as we go through the facts and the forensics on a homicide scene, we may be able to ascertain, you know, how much of what they said aligns with the evidence, right? And that becomes the discrepancy there is the thing that's relevant.
But I think one of the big red flags that we have to have is, you know, if we have a child and let's just say, apart from mother, I offer her a little hostess cupcake and you want this? And she's like, yeah, I want it. And she eats it. We immediately have a problem. That's a discrepancy between the two.
If I can see her, if I can observe her and I see that there's no indications of this, even if we do some legitimate test for it and it doesn't align with the thing that mom's saying. I mean, mom, during her interview with the police officers, she literally told them that
that she was telling the people at Seattle Children's, I feel like you want me to force this child to have a certain reaction, a certain symptom that presents in front of you, even if it takes harming my child to do so, just so that I can prove to you That what I'm saying is true.
I mean, that was one of the most loaded statements of that entire interview, just chock full with great indicators that we have to look in in behavior and like psycholinguistics, right? But she's giving these things to us. She's telling us.
This just in tonight, too, another CEO has quit the president's job council.
I've always been told I'm a really good listener, right? And I maximized that while I was lying.
I've always been told I'm a really good listener, right? And I maximized that while I was lying.
I've always been told I'm a really good listener, right? And I maximized that while I was lying.
I've always been told I'm a really good listener, right? And I maximized that while I was lying.
Showing 21–39 of 39 · page 2 of 2
← Previous