Michael Lee

I've got four of them living in my house. You know what I mean? Anybody that's got kids knows that, look, listen, if they're neurotypical with no – problems, medically, they're still really hard to deal with. It's stressful. We need breaks from them.

I've got four of them living in my house. You know what I mean? Anybody that's got kids knows that, look, listen, if they're neurotypical with no – problems, medically, they're still really hard to deal with. It's stressful. We need breaks from them.

I've got four of them living in my house. You know what I mean? Anybody that's got kids knows that, look, listen, if they're neurotypical with no – problems, medically, they're still really hard to deal with. It's stressful. We need breaks from them.

There's things that have to happen in order for us to keep our sanity and still maintain a healthy relationship with our kids and with our spouse and so forth and so on. And so when we see people that are inviting these things into their lives, I think we really do have to raise a big question mark there.

There's things that have to happen in order for us to keep our sanity and still maintain a healthy relationship with our kids and with our spouse and so forth and so on. And so when we see people that are inviting these things into their lives, I think we really do have to raise a big question mark there.

There's things that have to happen in order for us to keep our sanity and still maintain a healthy relationship with our kids and with our spouse and so forth and so on. And so when we see people that are inviting these things into their lives, I think we really do have to raise a big question mark there.

She starts making claims like, for instance, she stated at one point, epilepsy doesn't look like this. It looks like this other thing, you know? And, well, she's not a doctor, so you can't make a claim like that, right? But she's purporting herself, basically, like she plays that role on TV. And I'm telling you, epilepsy doesn't look like that, just so you know. It looks like this other thing.

She starts making claims like, for instance, she stated at one point, epilepsy doesn't look like this. It looks like this other thing, you know? And, well, she's not a doctor, so you can't make a claim like that, right? But she's purporting herself, basically, like she plays that role on TV. And I'm telling you, epilepsy doesn't look like that, just so you know. It looks like this other thing.

She starts making claims like, for instance, she stated at one point, epilepsy doesn't look like this. It looks like this other thing, you know? And, well, she's not a doctor, so you can't make a claim like that, right? But she's purporting herself, basically, like she plays that role on TV. And I'm telling you, epilepsy doesn't look like that, just so you know. It looks like this other thing.

Now, that's... Not as extreme a behavior because people will often think things. You know, they'll have their own perceptions of what things are supposed to be based on what they've heard.

Now, that's... Not as extreme a behavior because people will often think things. You know, they'll have their own perceptions of what things are supposed to be based on what they've heard.

Now, that's... Not as extreme a behavior because people will often think things. You know, they'll have their own perceptions of what things are supposed to be based on what they've heard.

But there's times that she really plays intentionally, like she is giving, she's saying a lot of real medical, heavy kind of literature lingo that she's throwing in the conversation to seem very, very knowledgeable, very, very. And that in and of itself presented itself in her statement commonly in a specific pattern. That pattern is what we like to call excessive non-relevant details.

But there's times that she really plays intentionally, like she is giving, she's saying a lot of real medical, heavy kind of literature lingo that she's throwing in the conversation to seem very, very knowledgeable, very, very. And that in and of itself presented itself in her statement commonly in a specific pattern. That pattern is what we like to call excessive non-relevant details.

But there's times that she really plays intentionally, like she is giving, she's saying a lot of real medical, heavy kind of literature lingo that she's throwing in the conversation to seem very, very knowledgeable, very, very. And that in and of itself presented itself in her statement commonly in a specific pattern. That pattern is what we like to call excessive non-relevant details.

So the investigators ask her a question. There's a specific answer they're looking for. Like, for instance, the question may be, so when did she get the AHC diagnosis, for example? And she doesn't answer that question.

So the investigators ask her a question. There's a specific answer they're looking for. Like, for instance, the question may be, so when did she get the AHC diagnosis, for example? And she doesn't answer that question.

So the investigators ask her a question. There's a specific answer they're looking for. Like, for instance, the question may be, so when did she get the AHC diagnosis, for example? And she doesn't answer that question.

she could say, oh, well, she got it in September of whatever year at this place, right? That's a direct answer. That's what we would expect a truthful person to do.

she could say, oh, well, she got it in September of whatever year at this place, right? That's a direct answer. That's what we would expect a truthful person to do.