Tom Renz

I mean, no one's going to say that this is a risk.

I mean, no one's going to say that this is a risk.

Well, I mean, the WHO's expecting, what was it, a 50% or 65% by 2030? Now, let me ask you this, Doc. Now, the WHO is predicting that sort of an increase in cancer. Well, if they're predicting that sort of an increase, there's a reason for it. Now, they're not being real forthcoming about why they think cancer is going to explode that much. but they're predicting it, right?

Well, I mean, the WHO's expecting, what was it, a 50% or 65% by 2030? Now, let me ask you this, Doc. Now, the WHO is predicting that sort of an increase in cancer. Well, if they're predicting that sort of an increase, there's a reason for it. Now, they're not being real forthcoming about why they think cancer is going to explode that much. but they're predicting it, right?

So what do they know that we don't? You know, what would cause, I mean, we've never had that sort of an explosion in cancer in human history. What's changed?

So what do they know that we don't? You know, what would cause, I mean, we've never had that sort of an explosion in cancer in human history. What's changed?

Uh, someone probably did ask why, you know, I didn't find anything that was all that conclusory, but I mean, you know, one of the things that they won't do is they won't, no one will touch or look at the fact that, you know, we've, we've mapped our whole genome, right?

Uh, someone probably did ask why, you know, I didn't find anything that was all that conclusory, but I mean, you know, one of the things that they won't do is they won't, no one will touch or look at the fact that, you know, we've, we've mapped our whole genome, right?

We've mapped the whole genome, but only 2% of our DNA, and you can correct me if I'm wrong on these numbers, but only 2% of our DNA codes for proteins. We don't know what the other 98% does. We have no idea what it's there for. So when we start inserting genetic material, well, maybe nothing, maybe something.

We've mapped the whole genome, but only 2% of our DNA, and you can correct me if I'm wrong on these numbers, but only 2% of our DNA codes for proteins. We don't know what the other 98% does. We have no idea what it's there for. So when we start inserting genetic material, well, maybe nothing, maybe something.

But when we start inserting genetic material that may or may not interact, what's going on there? And we also know even if that genetic material does not have SV4 to promoters and things like it where it may reintegrate back into the DNA, even if it doesn't, What we do know is there's a number of studies, and I actually have them on my other screen right here.

But when we start inserting genetic material that may or may not interact, what's going on there? And we also know even if that genetic material does not have SV4 to promoters and things like it where it may reintegrate back into the DNA, even if it doesn't, What we do know is there's a number of studies, and I actually have them on my other screen right here.

I was looking at them to prep for this interview. A number of studies suggesting that the spike protein itself is a pathogen. It crosses the blood-brain barrier. Oh, no doubt in my mind.

I was looking at them to prep for this interview. A number of studies suggesting that the spike protein itself is a pathogen. It crosses the blood-brain barrier. Oh, no doubt in my mind.

I mean, I can give you 14 trillion reasons in the United States alone. There's $14 trillion that changed hands in the United States alone based on COVID. I mean, so the amount of money there, the control, the power, and you know, I mean, there's conspiracy theories out there.

I mean, I can give you 14 trillion reasons in the United States alone. There's $14 trillion that changed hands in the United States alone based on COVID. I mean, so the amount of money there, the control, the power, and you know, I mean, there's conspiracy theories out there.

And I'm not going to discount them at this point because if you would allow children to be exposed to something that can kill them, With absolutely no benefit. I mean, there were no healthy children that died from COVID during the pandemic. Virtually, yes.

And I'm not going to discount them at this point because if you would allow children to be exposed to something that can kill them, With absolutely no benefit. I mean, there were no healthy children that died from COVID during the pandemic. Virtually, yes.

But, Doc, let me ask you this. If you would allow... If you would allow that, if you would support that, if you would promote something that has no known benefit and loads of risks in children, right, for money, because you get more money out of it. What ethical standards do you have? So when you say, what's the motivation? Well, it's money. They don't care about anything else.

But, Doc, let me ask you this. If you would allow... If you would allow that, if you would support that, if you would promote something that has no known benefit and loads of risks in children, right, for money, because you get more money out of it. What ethical standards do you have? So when you say, what's the motivation? Well, it's money. They don't care about anything else.