Elastic shares plunge 16 percent after revenue miss and deal timing issuesElastic ($ESTC) just dropped about 16% after its fiscal Q2 2026 results. The quarter was actually solid on the surface: revenue $423M, up 16% YoY, EPS $0.64 beat, and management raised full-year revenue guidance to about $1.715–$1.721B. But the market sold it hard because growth slowed vs last quarter, some deals slipped (management noted timing issues tied to the October US government shutdown), and investors are still debating how durable Elastic’s AI/search edge is against cloud-native alternatives. What this means: this is less about a broken business and more about expectations. In AI-adjacent software, even a small growth deceleration can trigger big multiple compression. Traders should expect sympathy moves across observability and consumption software, while money may rotate toward platform vendors viewed as safer or more bundled.Winners -Cloud hyperscalers and managed search/observability stacksWhy: If enterprises respond to Elastic’s wobble by consolidating tools, they often lean into native cloud logging, search, and AI services. That shifts spend to the big cloud platforms. Names: $MSFT, $AMZN, $GOOGLSecurity platforms bundling observability + AI analyticsWhy: Customers want fewer vendors and tighter AI workflows across security and logs. Elastic’s volatility makes all-in platforms look attractive for consolidation budgets. Names: $PANW, $CRWD, $CSCOLarge-cap enterprise software seen as “durable growth” refugesWhy: A sharp selloff in a mid-cap name often triggers rotation into bigger, stickier subscription platforms with steadier growth and clearer AI monetization narratives. Names: $NOW, $CRM, $ORCLLosers -Observability and log-analytics pure playsWhy: Elastic’s report reinforces that usage growth can be lumpy when customers optimize cloud spend. That read-through pressures the whole observability cohort. Names: $ESTC, $DDOG, $DTConsumption-based AI/data softwareWhy: When markets see any hint of slower consumption, they de-risk similar models ahead of earnings, even if fundamentals are fine. Names: $SNOW, $MDB, $CFLTMid-cap software priced for perfectionWhy: The takeaway from Elastic is simple: “good but not great” quarters get punished in high-multiple software. That can weigh on peers with similar expectation risk. Names: $NET, $HUBS, $ZM#StockMarket #Trading #Investing #DayTrading #SwingTrading #Elastic #ESTC #Observability #CloudComputing #EnterpriseSoftware #Earnings #AIStocks
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other recent transcribed episodes
Transcribed and ready to explore now
3ª PARTE | 17 DIC 2025 | EL PARTIDAZO DE COPE
01 Jan 1970
El Partidazo de COPE
12:00H | 21 DIC 2025 | Fin de Semana
01 Jan 1970
Fin de Semana
#158 - Szilágyi Tamás: A húszas éveid arra valók, hogy legalább egyszer becsődölj
21 Dec 2025
Mindenségit!
Willst du schnell einschlafen?ㅣDie Tannenduft-Wichtel
21 Dec 2025
Nachtflüstern - Geschichten zum Einschlafen
Tödliche Ernte
21 Dec 2025
Schattenakte - Der Fall der Woche
Origines de Stars : Shai Gilgeous Alexander ! (Calendrier Avent #21)
21 Dec 2025
Le Basket Lab (NBA Podcast)