1:23 - Thoughts on what the basis of in-game feedback should be (based on what the coaches think their players need vs. based on what the players want).2:04 - Should feedback be given based on past success?3:42 - Defining “guided discovery” and what role it should play when giving feedback.9:41 - Will forcing athletes to describe concepts and techniques in their own words create a better understanding?10:57 - Reflecting on Jamie Morrison’s episode on storytelling, how often does Andrew find himself using stories within practice, and has it been effective?13:14 - Creating intriguing names for drills to make it seem more exciting.15:13 - Balancing the “silliness” of naming drills with the actual competence of a certain drill to keep it fun, but also maintain its credibility.18:04 - Using the components of internal, external and holistic feedback, how would John structure his practices?20:37 - The most effective external feedback drills that coaches can implement into their practices.25:40 - Should coaches change internal ques or keys based on the athlete they approach (e.g. “slow to fast”)?29:31 - Are keys more so a tool for the coach or a solution given to the athlete?30:35 - Major feedback for coaches with regards to communication with their players.36:30 - A little bit about Nils’ new job working as the head coach for Baker University.BooksCoach Your Brains Out: The Art and Science of Coaching VolleyballThe Inner Knight: Train and Compete Like a ChampionContact us for bulk orders: [email protected] Become a Patron to support the show.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related