Consciousness Is a Cultural Add-onA Product of History Not Reducible to Neurology, Conscious Interiority Is Like MathematicsBy Brian J. McVeighProduced by Marcel Kuijsten. Read by Michael R. Jacobs (⁠www.theungoogleable.com⁠, ⁠www.youtube.com/@VoidDenizen⁠).When we hear the word “consciousness” many of us, in a knee-jerk manner, associate it with neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, or something physically inborn. We also link it to perceptual or cognitive processes that are non-historical and non-cultural. However, according to Jaynesian psychology, these are all misleading assumptions, since consciousness is not necessary for perception, learning, and reasoning. It is extra-genetic and a product of sociocultural forces and it entered the historical scene relatively recently, about three millennia ago. Indeed, as a culturally-configured form of knowledge, consciousness is closer to mathematics or other domains of learning. Consciousness is a very special form of knowledge, of course, but an array of socially-acquired ideas nevertheless. Let’s consider how mathematics is similar to consciousness.Read the complete text from this episode:https://www.julianjaynes.org/blog/julian-jaynes-theory/consciousness-is-a-cultural-add-on/Learn more about Julian Jaynes's theory or become a member by visiting the Julian Jaynes Society at ⁠⁠⁠www.julianjaynes.org⁠⁠⁠.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related