
In this archive episode, Dennis discusses the circumstances for PC regarding searching parked motor vehicles. Recorded on 09/16/2017 State v Colvin 1991 The "automobile exception" permits police to stop and search a moving or readily movable vehicle when there is probable cause to believe the vehicle contains criminally related objects. It also applies to parked motor vehicles. The rationale for this exception is grounded in the exigent circumstances created by the inherent mobility of vehicles and the somewhat lessened expectation of privacy in one's vehicle. [State v. Patino, 83 N.J. 1, 9, 414 A.2d 1327 (1980).]. We hold that when, without advance planning when police encounter a parked car and have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains criminal contraband such as drugs, and have articulable reasons to believe that the evidence may otherwise be lost or destroyed, they may seize and search the vehicle for the contraband without the necessity of a warrant. The ability to search a car does not depend on whether or not it is parked or moving, just remember that it must be unforeseeable and spontaneous. http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1991/123-n-j-428-1.html?fbclid=IwAR1o9cvO0I5Sm0_ba87VMRmm2RxgQkiTczfsVRLOCFDlm_9ZFqW8T20I97E (http://law.justia.com/.../supreme.../1991/123-n-j-428-1.html) State v Patino http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1980/83-n-j-1-0.html?fbclid=IwAR18V_498z22fU7tWHmmZ1J3fmSfs7aVW7gJhkKKJUQ4blIU9dju-6WTW5k (http://law.justia.com/.../supreme-court/1980/83-n-j-1-0.html)
No persons identified in this episode.
No transcription available yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster