Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast
Podcast Image

The Binge Crimes: Finding Mom's Killer

Deadly Fortune | 7. Extended Family

Fri, 27 Dec 2024

Description

Word spreads that Diane McIver was worth millions when she died.  And now, multiple parties come forward to claim stake to her fortune. Binge all episodes of Deadly Fortune, ad-free today by subscribing to The Binge. Visit The Binge Crimes on Apple Podcasts and hit ‘subscribe’ or visit GetTheBinge.com to get access.  The Binge – feed your true crime obsession. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Audio
Transcription

Chapter 1: What led to the legal battle over Diane McIver's fortune?

0.169 - 18.378 Unknown Speaker

Listen to all episodes of Deadly Fortune ad-free right now by subscribing to The Binge. Visit The Binge channel on Apple Podcasts and hit subscribe at the top of the page or visit GetTheBinge.com to get access wherever you listen. The Binge, feature true crime obsession.

0

26.21 - 47.534 J. Tom Morgan

I would meet Billy at the Downwinds restaurant there at P Street DeKalb Airport. And if you didn't know it was Billy Corey, you thought it was a poor homeless man sitting at the table hoping somebody would buy him a cheeseburger. But once you got to know him and to know Diane as well, you could see they were very talented at making money.

0

48.335 - 51.557 J. Tom Morgan

Billy would make money with Democrats, Republicans, Independents. It didn't matter.

0

52.297 - 61.263 Unknown Speaker

This is J. Tom Morgan, who knew most of the circle of players in this story and who has his own strong opinions on how this all played out.

0

62.223 - 76.53 J. Tom Morgan

I met Billy Corey when I worked for a law firm in Atlanta, and he was one of our clients. And that's how I got to know Diane as well. I'm a professor here at Western Carolina University, where I teach criminal law, criminal procedure, and legal ethics to students.

76.93 - 82.972 Unknown Speaker

Jay Tom was there for the trial, watching each move by both sides like a hawk.

84.133 - 98.999 J. Tom Morgan

And I sat through a good bit of the trial, just as a curious observer, not for any particular person. The whole story, both sides, didn't make sense, the prosecution theory and the defense theory.

100.183 - 126.479 J. Tom Morgan

again having known diane and i didn't know tets but i knew a lot of people who knew tets their relationship you know seemed okay though when they bought their piece of property that you know in middle georgia that tets like to call a ranch most of us from georgia will call it a farm But Diane made sure that Tetz gave her a promissory note for his part.

127.079 - 150.11 J. Tom Morgan

That's not your typical marriage arrangement. I think it goes back to that Diane was the one who had the business sense. They did not have any children. Tetz had children from a previous marriage. So I think Diane wanted to be careful with her assets, to be honest. I think Diane would take business over a marriage any day.

Chapter 2: Who were the key players in Diane's life?

513.155 - 534.47 J. Tom Morgan

I think he's extremely highly ethical. But at the same time, as I teach my students in ethics, the appearance of a conflict can be just as powerful as a real conflict. So for a judge to give his blessings to a plea deal that gives $1.5 million to the son of another Superior Court judge, we need to bring somebody else in.

0

535.97 - 553.235 Unknown Speaker

The Schwalls' claims that the McIvers wanted Austin to receive Diane's inheritance was not news. In fact, in March of 2018, Ann Schwall testified at Texas trial about Diane and Texas' wishes for Austin to have the ranch.

0

554.496 - 565.699 Ann Schwall

Now, can you tell the jurors, with respect to the ranch, did Diane McIver ever tell you what she wanted to do with the ranch when she died?

0

568.09 - 572.774 Jane Doe

Yes, she did tell me that she wanted Austin to have the ranch.

0

575.657 - 578.94 Ann Schwall

Do you remember when she told you that?

580.481 - 605.051 Jane Doe

I don't know the exact year. It was a while ago. Austin was younger. It was not recent. She told me that she wanted Austin to have the ranch. She felt like this was a special place for them and she wanted him to have it.

605.091 - 625.813 Ann Schwall

Can you tell the jury, after the death of Diane MacGyver, did you have a conversation with the defendant about Diane's 2006 will? I did. Can you tell the jury when was the first time you would have had this conversation with him about Diane's 2006 will?

626.854 - 627.714 Jane Doe

It was after her death.

629.255 - 632.657 Ann Schwall

I think a couple of days, a day, a week, a month?

Chapter 3: What were the insights from the trial?

1289.675 - 1293.979 Unknown Speaker

Frank's deceased wife Sandy and Diane were close cousins as kids.

0

1295.255 - 1307.601 Francis Carl Schenck

They grew up together. They were the best friends for years before they got out of high school, and then they kind of went separate ways. But up to then, they were together all the time. Their mothers were sisters.

0

1308.581 - 1318.206 Unknown Speaker

Frank lives in Peachtree City, Georgia, about an hour outside of Atlanta, and is an attorney, and he's kept a sharp eye on these recent developments.

0

1319.386 - 1345.164 Francis Carl Schenck

It's my understanding that the money is still... sitting in the account of an appointed administrator, and it's not going to be distributed until the question of his entitlement to it has been resolved. I certainly don't think he's entitled to any of it, but there are factual and legal questions that need to be resolved before that money can be distributed.

0

1345.624 - 1368.532 Francis Carl Schenck

As a moral issue, I certainly don't think he's entitled to a penny of it. What makes it so complicated is that he was found guilty of murder and they set that aside so everything went back to square one. And so the question that had been resolved by the finding that he was a murderer

1370.793 - 1394.734 Francis Carl Schenck

being set aside and then entering into a settlement, a plea bargain agreement that meant that the state didn't have to retry the case, did not resolve the civil issues that are still pending. And that's the reason that the money shouldn't be distributed to anyone until the civil questions have been resolved.

1396.218 - 1401.4 Unknown Speaker

At the end of the day, who should get the proceeds? Tex, his godsons, or the cousins?

1401.48 - 1421.688 Francis Carl Schenck

Well, the godsons aren't entitled to it at all. They don't have a say. The only two options are Tex and the heirs, which are the first cousins in the case. Tex can only get it if he's not barred by the Slayer statute.

1422.898 - 1448.412 Francis Carl Schenck

The parties that entered into the plea bargain agreement can't do an end run around the Slayer statute or try to avoid the Slayer statute simply by him making some kind of an agreement as to what he did or didn't do. They're trying to give the money to, they can't give it to the godsons.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.