The Collapse of GOLIATH Ventures Inc: Missed Promises, Narrative Control: The Calm Before the Storm

For weeks, investors were told payments were imminent. Specific dates were given. Confidence was projected. Assurances were repeated. Then the money didn’t arrive. What followed was silence, a luxury event, and eventually a carefully worded newsletter that raised more questions than it answered.This is a chronological breakdown of what actually happened, using Goliath’s own communications, timelines, and public behaviour.Read the full story about GOLIATH VENTURES INC on dehek.comIf you’d like to support what Danny de Hek does, you can do so here: https://ko-fi.com/dehek. Your support is truly appreciated.THE PROMISESIn early December, investors were explicitly told distributions would be paid on December 15 and December 18. Those dates came and went without payment. There was no advance warning, no immediate explanation, and no direct communication when the funds failed to arrive.When payments don’t show up on promised dates, the clock starts ticking.THE SILENCEAfter the missed payouts, communication slowed dramatically. There was no live address, no Q&A, no transparent engagement. Instead, investors were left waiting while uncertainty spread and private conversations intensified.Silence at this stage is not neutral. It changes behaviour.THE EVENTWhile investors were waiting on delayed distributions, Goliath had no visible difficulty spending millions on a high-production promotional event. There were no signs of restraint, no austerity, no indication that liquidity was a concern.The contrast was impossible to ignore.THE NEWSLETTEREventually, an “Operational Update” was released. It attempted to reset expectations without addressing the core issue: promised payments that didn’t happen.Rather than providing first-party proof — trades, wallet activity, performance data — the letter relied on generalised language, third-party examples, and future assurances. Investors weren’t shown what had been earned or where funds were. They were told to be patient.BANKING VS CRYPTOOne of the biggest contradictions in the explanation was the reliance on banking delays, despite the fact that investor payouts were made in crypto. Crypto payments don’t require wire transfers or traditional banking rails. That inconsistency was never reconciled.THIRD-PARTY EXAMPLESInstead of showing their own results, the newsletter pointed to large decentralised exchanges and industry-wide data to argue that the model could generate revenue. The problem is simple: proving that someone else makes money is not proof that you do.SOCIAL MEDIA GOES QUIETAround the same time, Goliath’s social media presence was effectively wiped. Historical posts disappeared. Engagement was disabled. Only a single post remained visible.When companies are confident, they communicate more. When they’re under pressure, they reduce visibility.DISTANCING BEGINSAs scrutiny increased, third parties began quietly cutting ties. Names were removed. Affiliations disappeared. Due diligence suddenly mattered.This is usually the phase before things escalate.THE CALM BEFORE THE STORMBehind the scenes, investor behaviour shifted. Screenshots were preserved. Conversations turned legal. People stopped waiting and started preparing.This isn’t panic. This is the calm before the storm — the moment when confidence collapses quietlBuy Me a Coffee I’m on @buymeacoffee. If you like my work, you can buy me a coffee and share your thoughts.Support the show

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.