David and Tamler argue about William James' classic essay "The Will to Believe." What's more important - avoiding falsehood or discovering truth? When (if ever) is it rational to believe anything without enough evidence? What about beliefs that we can't be agnostic about? Are there hypotheses that we have to believe in order for them to come true? Does James successfully demonstrate that faith can be rational? Plus, a philosopher at Apple who's not allowed to talk to the media - what are they hiding? And why are academics constantly telling students that academia is a nightmare? Support Very Bad Wizards Links: Apple won't let its in-house philosopher talk to the press — Quartz The Will to Believe - Wikipedia The Will to Believe (Full Text PDF) Evidentialism - Wikipedia
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other recent transcribed episodes
Transcribed and ready to explore now
Trump $82 Million Bond Spree, Brazil Tariffs 'Too High,' More
16 Nov 2025
Bloomberg News Now
Ex-Fed Gov Resigned After Rules Violations, Trump Buys $82 Mil of Bonds, More
16 Nov 2025
Bloomberg News Now
THIS TRUMP INTERVIEW WAS INSANE!
16 Nov 2025
HasanAbi
Epstein Emails and Trump's Alleged Involvement
15 Nov 2025
Conspiracy Theories Exploring The Unseen
New Epstein Emails Directly Implicate Trump - H3 Show #211
15 Nov 2025
H3 Podcast
Trump Humiliates Himself on FOX as They Call Him Out
15 Nov 2025
IHIP News