Aaron Parnas

I think that her being subpoenaed for oversight is kind of a bit of a egg on the face moment for DOJ.

Because it's not just like one or two Republicans who broke, it's five.

And I think that number will likely only grow if she gets up there and she just does a repeat of what she did in front of judiciary and just doesn't really answer any questions.

The problem with oversight, what people don't realize is that this is the committee where they stick kind of like the firebrands of each party on.

Like the freshman firebrands who just want to go and like throw bombs.

That's where they put them.

And so you have some of the, in a way, the craziest members on this committee, from Nancy Mace to Scott Perry to Anna Polina Luna.

These are like, you're not going to change their minds on Epstein.

Like, either Pam Bondi's going to come and answer their questions, and if she doesn't, they're going to vote to hold her in contempt.

This is very different.

So Pam Bondi should tread carefully.

Now, as far as the allegations from 2019...

and what was released.

I'm still going through some of them.

The allegations are horrific.

If they're true, they were, at least in the FBI's mind, legitimate enough to warrant not one, not two, but three interviews with this woman who accused the President of the United States.

After that third interview, I don't know what happened to the investigation.

There was some reporting that they found her not to be credible.

Whatever it is, I don't know.

It's not like you have a document saying what the FBI ended up doing.