Aaron

It's a really good bomber.

But then you have the F-35 and they're trying to do fighter, bomber, close air support.

And you're like, yeah, but an AC-130 gunship is a better close air support.

A B-52 is a better bomber.

And the F-22 is a better fighter.

So when you specialize, they're better.

And airplanes aren't people.

airplanes aren't people that is true well there's that attitude there's there's that's a good uh there's uh there's two schools of thought like one one school of thought you have the whole paul harvey thing where he says a human being should be able to you know uh feed a baby con a ship raise a garden you know live die laugh that whole thing yeah live laugh love

And it ends with specialization is for insects.

But on the flip side of that, you have, well, how many rice farmers in China does it take to cure cancer?

Right?

The answer is they'll never do it because they don't know anything about it.

So, like, I understand, especially, but, like, this isn't like, you know, if I have a airplane that's designed to hunt tanks, A-10 Warthog, and I push it into a...

uh, bomber role.

Well, it's not going to do very good now, is it?

But if I try to develop a gun or a plane that does fighter close air and bombing, it can't do it as good as one specialized for that.

Well, that's a jack of all trades.

Master of none.

But it's better than a master of one or whatever.

No one ever hears the best part of that.