Adam Harris

There are a lot of things there that are reminiscent of the ways that southern governors used to say that students at Alabama State couldn't have sit-ins, otherwise they were going to remove the funding from Alabama State College, right? It's adjudicating specific behaviors and speech that students are making, which is really a threat to all of the principles of an institution.

When an administration can come into an institution and say, you have to do this very specific thing. These are the policies that you have to implement. The principles of shared governance, the principles of academic freedom, the principles of a sort of free system of higher education really go away. And those same principles that are sort of the bedrocks of our democracy, right, the

When an administration can come into an institution and say, you have to do this very specific thing. These are the policies that you have to implement. The principles of shared governance, the principles of academic freedom, the principles of a sort of free system of higher education really go away. And those same principles that are sort of the bedrocks of our democracy, right, the

When an administration can come into an institution and say, you have to do this very specific thing. These are the policies that you have to implement. The principles of shared governance, the principles of academic freedom, the principles of a sort of free system of higher education really go away. And those same principles that are sort of the bedrocks of our democracy, right, the

The First Amendment is literally about free speech. When those sorts of things go away, it becomes a very dangerous environment that limits what people can say and do.

The First Amendment is literally about free speech. When those sorts of things go away, it becomes a very dangerous environment that limits what people can say and do.

The First Amendment is literally about free speech. When those sorts of things go away, it becomes a very dangerous environment that limits what people can say and do.

Yeah, yeah, I think, so that vision that Rufo discussed sort of happened in Hungary, where they're sort of trying to get back to the cultural traditions, the cultural values that the nation had, those sort of ideas of Christian faith, the ideas of sort of family life. In the same way, it sort of embodies that notion of make America great again.

Yeah, yeah, I think, so that vision that Rufo discussed sort of happened in Hungary, where they're sort of trying to get back to the cultural traditions, the cultural values that the nation had, those sort of ideas of Christian faith, the ideas of sort of family life. In the same way, it sort of embodies that notion of make America great again.

Yeah, yeah, I think, so that vision that Rufo discussed sort of happened in Hungary, where they're sort of trying to get back to the cultural traditions, the cultural values that the nation had, those sort of ideas of Christian faith, the ideas of sort of family life. In the same way, it sort of embodies that notion of make America great again.

And so the question has always been, well, when exactly was America great? And over the last several years, there has been an argument that has built up in conservative circles that America was great. better off in terms of these ideas of personal liberty and the freedom of association before the Civil Rights Act was signed.

And so the question has always been, well, when exactly was America great? And over the last several years, there has been an argument that has built up in conservative circles that America was great. better off in terms of these ideas of personal liberty and the freedom of association before the Civil Rights Act was signed.

And so the question has always been, well, when exactly was America great? And over the last several years, there has been an argument that has built up in conservative circles that America was great. better off in terms of these ideas of personal liberty and the freedom of association before the Civil Rights Act was signed.

That this sort of administrative state that has built up to enforce the rules of the Civil Rights Act. So you think about things like race-conscious admissions, which was just voted down at the Supreme Court. You think about these reassessments of curriculums, which prior to 1960s were legally allowed to obscure and or omit the contributions of African-Americans, of natives, of Mexican-Americans.

That this sort of administrative state that has built up to enforce the rules of the Civil Rights Act. So you think about things like race-conscious admissions, which was just voted down at the Supreme Court. You think about these reassessments of curriculums, which prior to 1960s were legally allowed to obscure and or omit the contributions of African-Americans, of natives, of Mexican-Americans.

That this sort of administrative state that has built up to enforce the rules of the Civil Rights Act. So you think about things like race-conscious admissions, which was just voted down at the Supreme Court. You think about these reassessments of curriculums, which prior to 1960s were legally allowed to obscure and or omit the contributions of African-Americans, of natives, of Mexican-Americans.

You consider the programs that were meant to diversify the workforce more generally. Those are some of the programs and things that conservatives are trying to attack in certain ways by saying that they basically discriminate against white people, that it's reverse discrimination to include those policies, which is why you see attacks—a part of this—

You consider the programs that were meant to diversify the workforce more generally. Those are some of the programs and things that conservatives are trying to attack in certain ways by saying that they basically discriminate against white people, that it's reverse discrimination to include those policies, which is why you see attacks—a part of this—

You consider the programs that were meant to diversify the workforce more generally. Those are some of the programs and things that conservatives are trying to attack in certain ways by saying that they basically discriminate against white people, that it's reverse discrimination to include those policies, which is why you see attacks—a part of this—

alongside that $400 million from Columbia was that broader letter, that dear colleague letter that said, hey, if you use race in scholarships, in hiring, in your sort of faculty committees, in your student groups, in any of these things, then we're going to investigate you and you are going to be in violation of Title VI. And when an institution hears you're going to be in violation of Title VI,