Adam Leventhal

And this is, the actual structure itself, none of the fields is commented.

You know how we, like, best practice would be to comment every structure member?

And in this particular source file, none of the structure members are commented.

And what its proposal was, was to actually comment the structure member, like for bad reasons, like we're not going to do that.

We're going to be consistent with what's there by not commenting the new member that you just added.

Like the code you want to actually write is actually cleaner than what's there.

But it does think, the other kind of thing that it brought to mind is like, boy, there's so much like technical debt kind of things.

And one thing I think would be interesting that actually we're going to see is people going into existing source code and commenting it better, using Claude to just have better comments.

Then obviously validating all of its work and not allowing, anyway, that's kind of my story from my experiment over the weekend doing Illumis kernel work and came away pretty impressed.

Yeah, definitely.

Yeah.

I mean, like this is one of these where I, in many ways I had biased it for maximal success.

I knew I had a pretty good idea of what it was going to look like.

Um,

But there's also some fiddly bits that people, you know, look at the, and I actually, I'll put a link to the diff in the actual bug.

It's like, there are some fiddly bits to get right, actually.

There's a little bit of math that needs to be, that you need to do correctly.

It's not, but yes, I definitely knew what the code was going to look like.

And this is, it doesn't span multiple things.

files.