Adam Leventhal

But it does think, the other kind of thing that it brought to mind is like, boy, there's so much like technical debt kind of things.

And one thing I think would be interesting that actually we're going to see is people going into existing source code and commenting it better, using Claude to just have better comments.

Then obviously validating all of its work and not allowing, anyway, that's kind of my story from my experiment over the weekend doing Illumis kernel work and came away pretty impressed.

Yeah, definitely.

Yeah.

I mean, like this is one of these where I, in many ways I had biased it for maximal success.

I knew I had a pretty good idea of what it was going to look like.

Um,

But there's also some fiddly bits that people, you know, look at the, and I actually, I'll put a link to the diff in the actual bug.

It's like, there are some fiddly bits to get right, actually.

There's a little bit of math that needs to be, that you need to do correctly.

It's not, but yes, I definitely knew what the code was going to look like.

And this is, it doesn't span multiple things.

files.

We're not introducing a new subsystem.

Like this is pretty straightforward as it goes.

So this is, I would say, a relatively, a case that is, that I really picked because it's kind of biased for success.

Also picked it because we need to do it, by the way.

I mean, that's the other thing.

It's like, this is like,