Advertisement Speaker
👤 SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
could potentially review his actions, but it wasn't the court's role.
could potentially review his actions, but it wasn't the court's role.
It's a hard argument to make. And, you know, I think even during some of the hearings, they were very skeptical of that argument and were even wondering aloud, like, well, what role should the court have? The judges were also a little skeptical about, you know, how do you measure what is a national emergency?
It's a hard argument to make. And, you know, I think even during some of the hearings, they were very skeptical of that argument and were even wondering aloud, like, well, what role should the court have? The judges were also a little skeptical about, you know, how do you measure what is a national emergency?
It's a hard argument to make. And, you know, I think even during some of the hearings, they were very skeptical of that argument and were even wondering aloud, like, well, what role should the court have? The judges were also a little skeptical about, you know, how do you measure what is a national emergency?
And, you know, one of the judges, I think maybe she did it in a tongue-in-cheek kind of manner, she posed this scenario. What about if there was this shortage of peanut butter? So she wanted to know, like, where the president's— Yeah, what's the line between, you know, a national emergency and just, you know, some kind of inconvenience to some people?
And, you know, one of the judges, I think maybe she did it in a tongue-in-cheek kind of manner, she posed this scenario. What about if there was this shortage of peanut butter? So she wanted to know, like, where the president's— Yeah, what's the line between, you know, a national emergency and just, you know, some kind of inconvenience to some people?
And, you know, one of the judges, I think maybe she did it in a tongue-in-cheek kind of manner, she posed this scenario. What about if there was this shortage of peanut butter? So she wanted to know, like, where the president's— Yeah, what's the line between, you know, a national emergency and just, you know, some kind of inconvenience to some people?
And I think a lot of legal experts feel like this case is eventually going to end up in the Supreme Court and will be decided there. I would say it has the potential to be a big loss for Trump.
And I think a lot of legal experts feel like this case is eventually going to end up in the Supreme Court and will be decided there. I would say it has the potential to be a big loss for Trump.
And I think a lot of legal experts feel like this case is eventually going to end up in the Supreme Court and will be decided there. I would say it has the potential to be a big loss for Trump.
I love Big Bird. I actually like you, too. But I'm not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for.
I love Big Bird. I actually like you, too. But I'm not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for.
I love Big Bird. I actually like you, too. But I'm not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for.
The kind of money that's being wasted, and it's a very biased view. You know that better than anybody. And I'd be honored to see it end.
The kind of money that's being wasted, and it's a very biased view. You know that better than anybody. And I'd be honored to see it end.
The kind of money that's being wasted, and it's a very biased view. You know that better than anybody. And I'd be honored to see it end.
I feel like it's propaganda. I feel like there's disinformation every time I listen to NPR.
I feel like it's propaganda. I feel like there's disinformation every time I listen to NPR.
I feel like it's propaganda. I feel like there's disinformation every time I listen to NPR.