Albert Breer
π€ SpeakerVoice Profile Active
This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.
Appearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Yeah, I would say like I try to look at these things like these things on timelines to some degree. And I do think if you look at Cleveland, it makes sense because they've got some aging players. And I think they're just now starting to feel the effects of like all the lost draft capital and the Deshaun Watson trade where like Cleveland, You know, their offensive line's gotten older.
They haven't really been able to replace some guys up there. They haven't really been able to fully go in on, you know, fixing the miss on Jedrick Wills. Now we'll see what happens with DeJuan Jones over there who showed some promise at left tackle. And so, like, I think this is like a soft reset for the Browns where it's like, OK.
They haven't really been able to replace some guys up there. They haven't really been able to fully go in on, you know, fixing the miss on Jedrick Wills. Now we'll see what happens with DeJuan Jones over there who showed some promise at left tackle. And so, like, I think this is like a soft reset for the Browns where it's like, OK.
They haven't really been able to replace some guys up there. They haven't really been able to fully go in on, you know, fixing the miss on Jedrick Wills. Now we'll see what happens with DeJuan Jones over there who showed some promise at left tackle. And so, like, I think this is like a soft reset for the Browns where it's like, OK.
you know we can kind of focus on rebuilding the guts of our roster as some of the guys that we went to the playoffs a couple times with age out which i think is smart now you're giving up a generational prospect that word gets thrown out a lot like obviously we haven't seen a guy like this so um it is there is risk involved in walking away from that prospect
you know we can kind of focus on rebuilding the guts of our roster as some of the guys that we went to the playoffs a couple times with age out which i think is smart now you're giving up a generational prospect that word gets thrown out a lot like obviously we haven't seen a guy like this so um it is there is risk involved in walking away from that prospect
you know we can kind of focus on rebuilding the guts of our roster as some of the guys that we went to the playoffs a couple times with age out which i think is smart now you're giving up a generational prospect that word gets thrown out a lot like obviously we haven't seen a guy like this so um it is there is risk involved in walking away from that prospect
And then like for the Jags, what's interesting about it is this is generally and look like I think the Rams background of both Gladstone and Cohen plays into it because there is that, you know, willingness to treat draft picks as being expendable. But the Rams did it when they felt like they were close and the Rams did it for veteran players in this case.
And then like for the Jags, what's interesting about it is this is generally and look like I think the Rams background of both Gladstone and Cohen plays into it because there is that, you know, willingness to treat draft picks as being expendable. But the Rams did it when they felt like they were close and the Rams did it for veteran players in this case.
And then like for the Jags, what's interesting about it is this is generally and look like I think the Rams background of both Gladstone and Cohen plays into it because there is that, you know, willingness to treat draft picks as being expendable. But the Rams did it when they felt like they were close and the Rams did it for veteran players in this case.
Is this telling us the Jaguars think they're closer than maybe the general public would believe and that they're in this go-for-it spot where they can give up capital and they don't have to worry about filling multiple spots over the next couple of drafts? That, to me, is the intriguing part because the timeline thing, that makes sense for Cleveland.
Is this telling us the Jaguars think they're closer than maybe the general public would believe and that they're in this go-for-it spot where they can give up capital and they don't have to worry about filling multiple spots over the next couple of drafts? That, to me, is the intriguing part because the timeline thing, that makes sense for Cleveland.
Is this telling us the Jaguars think they're closer than maybe the general public would believe and that they're in this go-for-it spot where they can give up capital and they don't have to worry about filling multiple spots over the next couple of drafts? That, to me, is the intriguing part because the timeline thing, that makes sense for Cleveland.
With Jacksonville, at least on the surface, it makes less sense, but maybe their evaluation, the new guys, their evaluation of the roster is a little different. And then as far as the price goes, Ryan,
With Jacksonville, at least on the surface, it makes less sense, but maybe their evaluation, the new guys, their evaluation of the roster is a little different. And then as far as the price goes, Ryan,
With Jacksonville, at least on the surface, it makes less sense, but maybe their evaluation, the new guys, their evaluation of the roster is a little different. And then as far as the price goes, Ryan,
I'm not surprised it was high because a lot of teams looked at this and I think this was what it was, what was going to make it difficult for the, either the Browns or the giants to trade down from two and three is that, I mean, when you're talking about the fourth, fifth, fifth pick, the sixth pick, a lot of teams looked at those this year and said, that's like having the 15th pick last year or the 20th pick last year.
I'm not surprised it was high because a lot of teams looked at this and I think this was what it was, what was going to make it difficult for the, either the Browns or the giants to trade down from two and three is that, I mean, when you're talking about the fourth, fifth, fifth pick, the sixth pick, a lot of teams looked at those this year and said, that's like having the 15th pick last year or the 20th pick last year.
I'm not surprised it was high because a lot of teams looked at this and I think this was what it was, what was going to make it difficult for the, either the Browns or the giants to trade down from two and three is that, I mean, when you're talking about the fourth, fifth, fifth pick, the sixth pick, a lot of teams looked at those this year and said, that's like having the 15th pick last year or the 20th pick last year.
And so it's, I think the way you have to look at that from a Browns perspective or a Giants perspective is you got to give me a lot because that's not like going down three picks. Like to me, prospect wise, that might feel a little bit more like going down 10 to 15 picks. Yeah.