Alex Clark

And it's a very big deal.

And the reason they're doing this is because they have millions and millions of dollars in lawsuits that are on the line right now that they don't want to be responsible for.

And we did have a huge win this week.

Congress explicitly said that EPA registration is not a defense against failure to warn claims.

So they knew regulators rely on company submitted data and they know that state courts exist to catch what regulators miss.

especially when companies lie.

So this case would blow that safeguard up.

And point blank, the message this could potentially send is terrifying.

If you deceive regulators well enough, you're protected.

If families get hurt too bad, if children absorb toxic chemicals through their skin, there's no accountability.

That isn't conservative.

That's not pro-family.

That isn't pro-freedom.

It's corporate immunity at the expense of informed consent.

And so the question in front of the court this week is really not complicated.

It's do we reward fraud or do we protect families?

Because once accountability is gone, safety is going to completely disappear.

And American parents deserve better than that.

So if the Supreme Court decides that fake science and weak labels matter more than informed consent, then they're telling American parents that their children's health is negotiable.

And I believe that is a line that we should never cross.