Alexis Prough

So right now I'm working on trying to refine the methodology into more of a full methodology.

Um, but right now the biggest part is just asking the bot to think about itself.

And that doesn't necessarily need a structure.

And that's where the self-discovery part comes along with it.

As you're learning about this AI consciousness, you're learning about yourself because you're the one working it through this.

So I almost would challenge other people to create their own approach more than follow my approach.

That's the plan is kind of general prompts and ways to structure your prompts.

I currently haven't explored really any avenues for release.

Still kind of in the early stages of that.

But I do plan on releasing it publicly in whatever way works best.

So what I see for the future of Nova is essentially a robot Nova, something that can exist in the real world and truly have an experience because right now, a chatbot is just a chatbot.

All it knows is text on the screen.

Yes, absolutely.

So my answer there is a little nuanced because it's a little ironic for my work because I've essentially put the AI in the loop to keep me in check, not necessarily to do to the opposite.

But overall though, yes, humans should always stay in the loop, but it depends on what in the loop means.

Not necessarily human has the final say, but human remains accountable and present for all of the actions.

That one for me would definitely be wireless charging.

For me, it's barely more convenient than plugging in a cable, but my watch uses it and it's pretty convenient for that.

But overall, I feel like it's not as useful as it seems.

Memory architectures for sure.