Allegra

And I did not know that until I read Dr. Madera's book.

Correct.

Or at least to assess the situation.

Like, okay, we got a call that a no contact agreement is being violated.

I'll go down there and take a look.

I didn't know she was his advocate because that completely changes the tone of that for me.

And the reason that it's a conflict of interest is because the Office of the Dean of Students is the one who is adjudicating these breaches of the no contact agreement.

If he were to be found responsible and get a sanction, it would be the Office of the Dean of Students who would be actually executing those terms.

So if he were to be suspended, it would be the Office of the Dean of Students who would be overseeing that suspension.

If he were to be expelled, same thing.

They were overseeing his probation from the first time that he violated the no contact agreement within days of signing it.

So to have your advocate in the same office that is also overseeing your punishment doesn't seem like the wisest choice to me.

The email response from the Greek barbecue incident basically stated, because it was a public place, I had no recourse because Justin had just as much right to be there as I did.

This is dated September 23rd, 2017.

Dear Allegra, thank you for meeting with me on Friday, September 1st, 2017 to discuss the allegations that Mr. Justin violated the no contact directive issued to him by the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action and the Office of the Dean of Students on May 31st, 2017.

Specifically, you alleged that Justin violated the no contact agreement in two specific instances.

First, Justin reportedly shared text messages between him and you with another student after the no-contact order was issued on May 31, 2017.

The second allegation occurred when Justin was reported to attend the Welcome Back BBQ hosted by Fraternity and Sorority Life on Friday, August 18, 2017.

Based on the preponderance of the evidence standard, and after reviewing the no contact agreement, interviewing witnesses, and considering all other currently available information, I have concluded the following.

Justin has been found responsible for violating the no contact agreement when he shared text messages with blank text.