Amanda Frost
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
He surely knew that if he lost, he would be forced to leave the United States, the country in which he'd been born and spent most of his life. The End
They're in the Capitol building because there was no Supreme Court building at this time. And they were in front of these nine black robed men with Chief Justice Fuller in the middle, who was very short, so he was sitting on an elevated chair.
They're in the Capitol building because there was no Supreme Court building at this time. And they were in front of these nine black robed men with Chief Justice Fuller in the middle, who was very short, so he was sitting on an elevated chair.
They're in the Capitol building because there was no Supreme Court building at this time. And they were in front of these nine black robed men with Chief Justice Fuller in the middle, who was very short, so he was sitting on an elevated chair.
Many members of the court were on record as being hostile to Chinese immigrants. The argument took place over two different days, Friday, March 5th, 1897, and Monday, March 8th, 1897.
Many members of the court were on record as being hostile to Chinese immigrants. The argument took place over two different days, Friday, March 5th, 1897, and Monday, March 8th, 1897.
Many members of the court were on record as being hostile to Chinese immigrants. The argument took place over two different days, Friday, March 5th, 1897, and Monday, March 8th, 1897.
He would have argued, as he did in his brief, that the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all born in the United States... has a caveat, or he would have said an exception, which is only those who are born in the United States and who are subject to its jurisdiction are automatically birthright citizens of the United States.
He would have argued, as he did in his brief, that the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all born in the United States... has a caveat, or he would have said an exception, which is only those who are born in the United States and who are subject to its jurisdiction are automatically birthright citizens of the United States.
He would have argued, as he did in his brief, that the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all born in the United States... has a caveat, or he would have said an exception, which is only those who are born in the United States and who are subject to its jurisdiction are automatically birthright citizens of the United States.
And so Holmes Conrad would have grasped on to that language and said, well, Wong K. Mark, sure, he was born in the United States. We can't refute that. But we do not think he was subject to the jurisdiction of the United States because his parents were loyal to the emperor of China. And so was their son by sort of automatic transmission.
And so Holmes Conrad would have grasped on to that language and said, well, Wong K. Mark, sure, he was born in the United States. We can't refute that. But we do not think he was subject to the jurisdiction of the United States because his parents were loyal to the emperor of China. And so was their son by sort of automatic transmission.
And so Holmes Conrad would have grasped on to that language and said, well, Wong K. Mark, sure, he was born in the United States. We can't refute that. But we do not think he was subject to the jurisdiction of the United States because his parents were loyal to the emperor of China. And so was their son by sort of automatic transmission.
And so that means the son cannot automatically acquire citizenship based on birth.
And so that means the son cannot automatically acquire citizenship based on birth.
And so that means the son cannot automatically acquire citizenship based on birth.
Also said to the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is itself unconstitutional. And his reason for that was he said the South was coerced into ratifying the 14th Amendment in 1868, and therefore it was never validly a part of the Constitution. And we can see in that argument, of course, that he's trying to litigate the Civil War. He's trying to say,
Also said to the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is itself unconstitutional. And his reason for that was he said the South was coerced into ratifying the 14th Amendment in 1868, and therefore it was never validly a part of the Constitution. And we can see in that argument, of course, that he's trying to litigate the Civil War. He's trying to say,
Also said to the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is itself unconstitutional. And his reason for that was he said the South was coerced into ratifying the 14th Amendment in 1868, and therefore it was never validly a part of the Constitution. And we can see in that argument, of course, that he's trying to litigate the Civil War. He's trying to say,
The Reconstruction Amendment should not be law. We should turn back the clock.