Amanda Knox
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Yes. OK. Yeah. No, it was that that this whole.
Yes. OK. Yeah. No, it was that that this whole.
Yes. OK. Yeah. No, it was that that this whole.
You don't have brakes. Right.
You don't have brakes. Right.
You don't have brakes. Right.
Right. A little bit of like self brainwashing. And that fascinates me. Like in conversations with my prosecutor, how how has he convinced himself that he's the good guy? And and how has that changed when I have approached him not as an adversary, but as someone who is a.
Right. A little bit of like self brainwashing. And that fascinates me. Like in conversations with my prosecutor, how how has he convinced himself that he's the good guy? And and how has that changed when I have approached him not as an adversary, but as someone who is a.
Right. A little bit of like self brainwashing. And that fascinates me. Like in conversations with my prosecutor, how how has he convinced himself that he's the good guy? And and how has that changed when I have approached him not as an adversary, but as someone who is a.
I wouldn't say like tolerant because I've never put myself in a position of sort of saying, oh, what you did was not a big deal. Like when I approached him, I was like, what you did was a big deal and you were wrong and you hurt people. But like acknowledging his humanity and the complexity of him and acknowledging that like he's not an evil person.
I wouldn't say like tolerant because I've never put myself in a position of sort of saying, oh, what you did was not a big deal. Like when I approached him, I was like, what you did was a big deal and you were wrong and you hurt people. But like acknowledging his humanity and the complexity of him and acknowledging that like he's not an evil person.
I wouldn't say like tolerant because I've never put myself in a position of sort of saying, oh, what you did was not a big deal. Like when I approached him, I was like, what you did was a big deal and you were wrong and you hurt people. But like acknowledging his humanity and the complexity of him and acknowledging that like he's not an evil person.
Intentional malice, maybe?
Intentional malice, maybe?
Intentional malice, maybe?
If that's not evil... I mean, what he did, it's interesting. He wrote a whole book about the case, and he talked about how when he first arrived at the scene, he immediately knew that it was a conspiracy because he looked at the broken window, how the person had actually broken into our home, and said... There's no way, zero chance that a burglar would have broken into a house this way.
If that's not evil... I mean, what he did, it's interesting. He wrote a whole book about the case, and he talked about how when he first arrived at the scene, he immediately knew that it was a conspiracy because he looked at the broken window, how the person had actually broken into our home, and said... There's no way, zero chance that a burglar would have broken into a house this way.
If that's not evil... I mean, what he did, it's interesting. He wrote a whole book about the case, and he talked about how when he first arrived at the scene, he immediately knew that it was a conspiracy because he looked at the broken window, how the person had actually broken into our home, and said... There's no way, zero chance that a burglar would have broken into a house this way.
He just was like 100 percent convinced that immediately that the break in was staged. And if you take that, if you and your brain truly believe that. Then what logically follows is a lot of what he then came up with. Well, someone in the house is trying to cover up for a crime that they were involved in. Who lives in that house?