Amy Robach
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Amy and TJ presents Aubrey O'Day covering the Diddy Trial. Hello, everybody. Welcome to Amy and TJ Presents. Aubrey O'Day covering the Diddy trial. I'm TJ Holmes here alongside my partner, my friend, my co-host, Amy Robach. And we have Robes being gotten helped along the way in covering this trial and getting some insights from Aubrey, of course.
And we're going to continue that now after what was the last full day of testimony we saw was one of the most highly anticipated days because of one of the most highly anticipated witnesses.
And we're going to continue that now after what was the last full day of testimony we saw was one of the most highly anticipated days because of one of the most highly anticipated witnesses.
And we're going to continue that now after what was the last full day of testimony we saw was one of the most highly anticipated days because of one of the most highly anticipated witnesses.
You know, what did you make of that? I don't look. He has his own style, his own thing. But I looked up and saw it and I'm not sure what it said to me. But what did it say to you? Leather motorcycle jacket, white smoking a cigarette going into this truck.
You know, what did you make of that? I don't look. He has his own style, his own thing. But I looked up and saw it and I'm not sure what it said to me. But what did it say to you? Leather motorcycle jacket, white smoking a cigarette going into this truck.
You know, what did you make of that? I don't look. He has his own style, his own thing. But I looked up and saw it and I'm not sure what it said to me. But what did it say to you? Leather motorcycle jacket, white smoking a cigarette going into this truck.
To your point that, yes, given what they're trying to build here as a criminal enterprise, does that hurt? Yes, this stuff happened, but did they actually prove that Diddy was behind it?
To your point that, yes, given what they're trying to build here as a criminal enterprise, does that hurt? Yes, this stuff happened, but did they actually prove that Diddy was behind it?
To your point that, yes, given what they're trying to build here as a criminal enterprise, does that hurt? Yes, this stuff happened, but did they actually prove that Diddy was behind it?
Yeah, their argument there was once Kid Cudi got there.
Yeah, their argument there was once Kid Cudi got there.
Yeah, their argument there was once Kid Cudi got there.
They weren't there.
They weren't there.
They weren't there.
We can piece it all together. A hundred percent. All this stuff looks bad. But in the in the do you get concerned that from a legal standpoint, we end up all this looks bad. And yet surely he was involved in that. Like, yeah, we know he was. But did they prove the case?
We can piece it all together. A hundred percent. All this stuff looks bad. But in the in the do you get concerned that from a legal standpoint, we end up all this looks bad. And yet surely he was involved in that. Like, yeah, we know he was. But did they prove the case?
We can piece it all together. A hundred percent. All this stuff looks bad. But in the in the do you get concerned that from a legal standpoint, we end up all this looks bad. And yet surely he was involved in that. Like, yeah, we know he was. But did they prove the case?
Are they making too much of, and yes, it's a fun headline to a certain degree about Cuddy calling Diddy a supervillain, said he looked like a Marvel supervillain. That got headlines, but beyond just a headline and it maybe even being clickbait, how meaningful was that description in your opinion?