Amy Scott

in um in wage growth uh will it be enough to perk up consumers voters views of the economy i'm not so convinced we'll we'll watch for that all right katherine rampell is at the bulwark at ms now greg ip with the wall street journal thanks both so much and have a great weekend thanks for having me on wall street a mixed trading day on this friday the 13th we'll have the details when we do the numbers

The Trump administration is calling it the largest deregulatory action in history that'll save businesses and consumers money.

The Trump administration is calling it the largest deregulatory action in history that'll save businesses and consumers money.

Scientists and environmental advocates, though, say it's a gift to fossil fuel companies that will make people sicker and less safe.

Scientists and environmental advocates, though, say it's a gift to fossil fuel companies that will make people sicker and less safe.

I'm talking about the repeal this week of the endangerment finding.

I'm talking about the repeal this week of the endangerment finding.

That's the EPA's 2009 decision that planet-warming greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and welfare.

That's the EPA's 2009 decision that planet-warming greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and welfare.

and it underpins the agency's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

and it underpins the agency's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

The administration claims the repeal will save more than a trillion dollars in regulatory costs and make cars and trucks more affordable.

The administration claims the repeal will save more than a trillion dollars in regulatory costs and make cars and trucks more affordable.

But as Marketplace's Kaylee Wells reports, climate change is expensive too.

But as Marketplace's Kaylee Wells reports, climate change is expensive too.

The EPA's argument is, by no longer considering the human harm caused by emissions, taxpayers will save $1.3 trillion in energy and transportation.

The EPA's argument is, by no longer considering the human harm caused by emissions, taxpayers will save $1.3 trillion in energy and transportation.

Cars will be $2,400 cheaper to make, according to the agency, and taxpayer money won't go toward regulating the industry.

Cars will be $2,400 cheaper to make, according to the agency, and taxpayer money won't go toward regulating the industry.

Environment and politics professor Dana R. Fisher at American University is not convinced.