Andrea Dunlop

Not a memory that somehow, like, it doesn't sound like it'd be very viable to implant a memory that spans four years of someone's life that just happened.

Yeah. So, yeah. I mean, I think to call this claim suspicious is probably too light of a word.

Yeah. So, yeah. I mean, I think to call this claim suspicious is probably too light of a word.

Yeah. So, yeah. I mean, I think to call this claim suspicious is probably too light of a word.

I think so. And I mean, I will tell you, so a couple of reflections I had had about this. I think the reason, you know, the reason that this didn't, that this wasn't listed in the original complaint and that it got added, my suspicion, my suspicion is because if you hear this story OK, so you have this child who is being, you know, the hospital suspects she's being abused.

I think so. And I mean, I will tell you, so a couple of reflections I had had about this. I think the reason, you know, the reason that this didn't, that this wasn't listed in the original complaint and that it got added, my suspicion, my suspicion is because if you hear this story OK, so you have this child who is being, you know, the hospital suspects she's being abused.

I think so. And I mean, I will tell you, so a couple of reflections I had had about this. I think the reason, you know, the reason that this didn't, that this wasn't listed in the original complaint and that it got added, my suspicion, my suspicion is because if you hear this story OK, so you have this child who is being, you know, the hospital suspects she's being abused.

They present evidence to the court and then the court, you know, unfortunately, which is, again, you know, something that we know really well, but then maybe people don't know as much that the courts do not, by and large, have a strong understanding of Munchausen by proxy abuse. There is this idea put forth by lawsuits like this that.

They present evidence to the court and then the court, you know, unfortunately, which is, again, you know, something that we know really well, but then maybe people don't know as much that the courts do not, by and large, have a strong understanding of Munchausen by proxy abuse. There is this idea put forth by lawsuits like this that.

They present evidence to the court and then the court, you know, unfortunately, which is, again, you know, something that we know really well, but then maybe people don't know as much that the courts do not, by and large, have a strong understanding of Munchausen by proxy abuse. There is this idea put forth by lawsuits like this that.

it's just so easy for them to make up claims of abuse because the courts will believe them every time. And I'm like, well, you're not watching the same case as I'm watching. Because what we know is that judges frequently do not consider the opinions of doctors or they will weigh the opinions of like,

it's just so easy for them to make up claims of abuse because the courts will believe them every time. And I'm like, well, you're not watching the same case as I'm watching. Because what we know is that judges frequently do not consider the opinions of doctors or they will weigh the opinions of like,

it's just so easy for them to make up claims of abuse because the courts will believe them every time. And I'm like, well, you're not watching the same case as I'm watching. Because what we know is that judges frequently do not consider the opinions of doctors or they will weigh the opinions of like,

you know, paid consultants that have not treated the child the same as they will weigh, you know, opinions of doctors who are treating the child and who are much better, you know, much more trained. So that is just not an assumption that you can make that the courts are going to take what doctors have to say seriously. That really depends on the judge. And I think I can

you know, paid consultants that have not treated the child the same as they will weigh, you know, opinions of doctors who are treating the child and who are much better, you know, much more trained. So that is just not an assumption that you can make that the courts are going to take what doctors have to say seriously. That really depends on the judge. And I think I can

you know, paid consultants that have not treated the child the same as they will weigh, you know, opinions of doctors who are treating the child and who are much better, you know, much more trained. So that is just not an assumption that you can make that the courts are going to take what doctors have to say seriously. That really depends on the judge. And I think I can

pretty confidently say by and large that more often they don't take this abuse seriously than that they do. We don't have the full copy of the judge's order, but a couple of the quotes that were included leads me to believe that he maybe has some strong biases in the plaintiff's corner. But he does say that this covert video surveillance was a horrible invasion of privacy.

pretty confidently say by and large that more often they don't take this abuse seriously than that they do. We don't have the full copy of the judge's order, but a couple of the quotes that were included leads me to believe that he maybe has some strong biases in the plaintiff's corner. But he does say that this covert video surveillance was a horrible invasion of privacy.

pretty confidently say by and large that more often they don't take this abuse seriously than that they do. We don't have the full copy of the judge's order, but a couple of the quotes that were included leads me to believe that he maybe has some strong biases in the plaintiff's corner. But he does say that this covert video surveillance was a horrible invasion of privacy.

So I think he then maybe has some different ideas about what about privacy in hospital settings than you or I do. Like maybe they really did. Maybe their rights were violated. Maybe this family did get treated badly. Maybe there are some systemic problems here. If you then hear this next chapter of what happened and said, okay, after custody was returned to the parents,