Andrea Dunlop

So I think one of the things, again, not being a lawyer, but one of the things that's been so interesting as I've gotten into the legal side of this, and I think even as we've seen some of these huge cases, you know, Supreme Court cases play out in the last few years. and such, it's like, you know, the law is constantly open to interpretation and challenge. Right.

So I think one of the things, again, not being a lawyer, but one of the things that's been so interesting as I've gotten into the legal side of this, and I think even as we've seen some of these huge cases, you know, Supreme Court cases play out in the last few years. and such, it's like, you know, the law is constantly open to interpretation and challenge. Right.

And so just because there's precedent, you know, and some I think a lot of lawyers, you know, a lot of things I've heard from people about medical child abuse cases is that lawyers don't like to set precedent or like DAs don't like to set precedent.

And so just because there's precedent, you know, and some I think a lot of lawyers, you know, a lot of things I've heard from people about medical child abuse cases is that lawyers don't like to set precedent or like DAs don't like to set precedent.

And so just because there's precedent, you know, and some I think a lot of lawyers, you know, a lot of things I've heard from people about medical child abuse cases is that lawyers don't like to set precedent or like DAs don't like to set precedent.

But then I think there are some lawyers maybe that do and that really that is like sort of more activist lawyers that really do want to like overturn things. I kind of think about these things as like when you think about that kind of the trajectory that overturned Roe v. Wade. Right. It was a series of cases along the line that then ended up overturning, you know, 40 years of precedent.

But then I think there are some lawyers maybe that do and that really that is like sort of more activist lawyers that really do want to like overturn things. I kind of think about these things as like when you think about that kind of the trajectory that overturned Roe v. Wade. Right. It was a series of cases along the line that then ended up overturning, you know, 40 years of precedent.

But then I think there are some lawyers maybe that do and that really that is like sort of more activist lawyers that really do want to like overturn things. I kind of think about these things as like when you think about that kind of the trajectory that overturned Roe v. Wade. Right. It was a series of cases along the line that then ended up overturning, you know, 40 years of precedent.

So or 50 years of precedent. So I think there is precedent where this kind of evidence has been accepted and sort of the. You know, I don't know the exact legal language, but basically there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you're in a hospital room.

So or 50 years of precedent. So I think there is precedent where this kind of evidence has been accepted and sort of the. You know, I don't know the exact legal language, but basically there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you're in a hospital room.

So or 50 years of precedent. So I think there is precedent where this kind of evidence has been accepted and sort of the. You know, I don't know the exact legal language, but basically there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you're in a hospital room.

You know, I think beyond probably like being in the bathroom or something, but like, you know, but that this is included in hospital policy and that kind of thing. So obviously this case, like part of the point of it seems to be to challenge that, right? And to say that like to set a new precedent that you actually cannot surveil families when you suspect that they're abusing their child.

You know, I think beyond probably like being in the bathroom or something, but like, you know, but that this is included in hospital policy and that kind of thing. So obviously this case, like part of the point of it seems to be to challenge that, right? And to say that like to set a new precedent that you actually cannot surveil families when you suspect that they're abusing their child.

You know, I think beyond probably like being in the bathroom or something, but like, you know, but that this is included in hospital policy and that kind of thing. So obviously this case, like part of the point of it seems to be to challenge that, right? And to say that like to set a new precedent that you actually cannot surveil families when you suspect that they're abusing their child.

And again, it's this tension between a parent's rights to privacy versus the safety of their child. And so I think it just kind of speaks to that tension. So certainly, like, that piece about this covert video surveillance will be interesting to see how it plays out. The manufacturing piece...

And again, it's this tension between a parent's rights to privacy versus the safety of their child. And so I think it just kind of speaks to that tension. So certainly, like, that piece about this covert video surveillance will be interesting to see how it plays out. The manufacturing piece...

And again, it's this tension between a parent's rights to privacy versus the safety of their child. And so I think it just kind of speaks to that tension. So certainly, like, that piece about this covert video surveillance will be interesting to see how it plays out. The manufacturing piece...

that obviously sounds like, because I think like it's not an argument I agree with that parents should have, that their privacy should go over the child's wellbeing. But I sort of see the argument, right? That like, I see where you're making a privacy argument and you're making, you know, like a fourth amendment type of complaint, right? Like that, that makes sense.

that obviously sounds like, because I think like it's not an argument I agree with that parents should have, that their privacy should go over the child's wellbeing. But I sort of see the argument, right? That like, I see where you're making a privacy argument and you're making, you know, like a fourth amendment type of complaint, right? Like that, that makes sense.

that obviously sounds like, because I think like it's not an argument I agree with that parents should have, that their privacy should go over the child's wellbeing. But I sort of see the argument, right? That like, I see where you're making a privacy argument and you're making, you know, like a fourth amendment type of complaint, right? Like that, that makes sense.