Andrea Dunlop

And then you have the six members of the jury, the people who are actually going to decide this thing. And they are sort of sitting off camera like a great chorus. And being on a jury like this is no joke.

And then you have the six members of the jury, the people who are actually going to decide this thing. And they are sort of sitting off camera like a great chorus. And being on a jury like this is no joke.

And then you have the six members of the jury, the people who are actually going to decide this thing. And they are sort of sitting off camera like a great chorus. And being on a jury like this is no joke.

And as to what the plaintiff wants, according to Jonathan, more or less the opposite.

And as to what the plaintiff wants, according to Jonathan, more or less the opposite.

And as to what the plaintiff wants, according to Jonathan, more or less the opposite.

So what is the jury being asked to decide on at this point? The charges have been narrowed over the six years that this lawsuit has dragged on as the judge has issued what are called directed verdicts. Here are the current charges as they stand from the eighth amendment to the original complaint.

So what is the jury being asked to decide on at this point? The charges have been narrowed over the six years that this lawsuit has dragged on as the judge has issued what are called directed verdicts. Here are the current charges as they stand from the eighth amendment to the original complaint.

So what is the jury being asked to decide on at this point? The charges have been narrowed over the six years that this lawsuit has dragged on as the judge has issued what are called directed verdicts. Here are the current charges as they stand from the eighth amendment to the original complaint.

There is a count of false imprisonment, though this has been narrowed considerably to the days between the admission to Johns Hopkins and the DCF order coming down, as it's been determined already that this original call was made in good faith. Battery is still in, but also considerably narrowed.

There is a count of false imprisonment, though this has been narrowed considerably to the days between the admission to Johns Hopkins and the DCF order coming down, as it's been determined already that this original call was made in good faith. Battery is still in, but also considerably narrowed.

There is a count of false imprisonment, though this has been narrowed considerably to the days between the admission to Johns Hopkins and the DCF order coming down, as it's been determined already that this original call was made in good faith. Battery is still in, but also considerably narrowed.

Now it is only regarding the incident involving the photographs that were taken of Maya before her court appearance. there is medical malpractice. For this, they have to prove that Johns Hopkins violated the standard of care while Maya was with them. There is negligent hiring and supervision and training of Kathy Beattie and a separate charge for all of the doctors at Johns Hopkins.

Now it is only regarding the incident involving the photographs that were taken of Maya before her court appearance. there is medical malpractice. For this, they have to prove that Johns Hopkins violated the standard of care while Maya was with them. There is negligent hiring and supervision and training of Kathy Beattie and a separate charge for all of the doctors at Johns Hopkins.

Now it is only regarding the incident involving the photographs that were taken of Maya before her court appearance. there is medical malpractice. For this, they have to prove that Johns Hopkins violated the standard of care while Maya was with them. There is negligent hiring and supervision and training of Kathy Beattie and a separate charge for all of the doctors at Johns Hopkins.

There's a charge of fraudulent concealment. This has to do with a video allegedly taken while Maya was in the EEG room. This is a room where they do certain types of testing. And the plaintiff claims this video contains exculpatory evidence that was allegedly kept from them. Allegedly. There is one count remaining for the insurance fraud.

There's a charge of fraudulent concealment. This has to do with a video allegedly taken while Maya was in the EEG room. This is a room where they do certain types of testing. And the plaintiff claims this video contains exculpatory evidence that was allegedly kept from them. Allegedly. There is one count remaining for the insurance fraud.

There's a charge of fraudulent concealment. This has to do with a video allegedly taken while Maya was in the EEG room. This is a room where they do certain types of testing. And the plaintiff claims this video contains exculpatory evidence that was allegedly kept from them. Allegedly. There is one count remaining for the insurance fraud.

This is honestly the most confusing to me because parts of it have been taken out. Parts of it remain. Big question mark about this one. And there's a count for negligent infliction of emotional distress and a separate count for intentional infliction of emotional distress. So these have both been somewhat narrowed.

This is honestly the most confusing to me because parts of it have been taken out. Parts of it remain. Big question mark about this one. And there's a count for negligent infliction of emotional distress and a separate count for intentional infliction of emotional distress. So these have both been somewhat narrowed.