Andrea Dunlop

So now is a great time to ditch overpriced wireless and get three months of premium wireless service from Mint Mobile for just $15 a month. So no matter how you say it, don't overpay for it. Shop data plans. Okay, I guess that's how I say it. at mintmobile.com slash believeme. That's mintmobile.com slash believeme.

You can find that information in our show notes, and remember that shopping our sponsors is a great way to support the show. Upfront payment of $45 for a three-month, five-gigabyte plan required, equivalent to $15 a month. New customer offer for first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. Hello, Dr. Becks.

You can find that information in our show notes, and remember that shopping our sponsors is a great way to support the show. Upfront payment of $45 for a three-month, five-gigabyte plan required, equivalent to $15 a month. New customer offer for first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. Hello, Dr. Becks.

You can find that information in our show notes, and remember that shopping our sponsors is a great way to support the show. Upfront payment of $45 for a three-month, five-gigabyte plan required, equivalent to $15 a month. New customer offer for first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. Hello, Dr. Becks.

So thank you as much for being here to walk us through the rest of what we know right now about the lawsuit involving the Mayer family and Ratty Children's in San Diego. So Becks, can you just catch us up on where we left off in the last episode and just get us back into what we know about the series of events that led up to this lawsuit? So

So thank you as much for being here to walk us through the rest of what we know right now about the lawsuit involving the Mayer family and Ratty Children's in San Diego. So Becks, can you just catch us up on where we left off in the last episode and just get us back into what we know about the series of events that led up to this lawsuit? So

So thank you as much for being here to walk us through the rest of what we know right now about the lawsuit involving the Mayer family and Ratty Children's in San Diego. So Becks, can you just catch us up on where we left off in the last episode and just get us back into what we know about the series of events that led up to this lawsuit? So

Got it. And I did want to just flag that we have heard from some listeners who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome after the airing of our first episode. And so we just wanted to recognize that and say, anybody, feel free to always send us your feedback. But nothing about this conversation is meant to indicate that Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. in and of itself is a questionable condition.

Got it. And I did want to just flag that we have heard from some listeners who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome after the airing of our first episode. And so we just wanted to recognize that and say, anybody, feel free to always send us your feedback. But nothing about this conversation is meant to indicate that Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. in and of itself is a questionable condition.

Got it. And I did want to just flag that we have heard from some listeners who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome after the airing of our first episode. And so we just wanted to recognize that and say, anybody, feel free to always send us your feedback. But nothing about this conversation is meant to indicate that Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. in and of itself is a questionable condition.

It is very much a real thing and can lead to quite a bit of medical complexity. So we just wanted to recognize that up top.

It is very much a real thing and can lead to quite a bit of medical complexity. So we just wanted to recognize that up top.

It is very much a real thing and can lead to quite a bit of medical complexity. So we just wanted to recognize that up top.

Yeah, and we still have much more to unpack about this particular case, but whenever we are talking about illnesses that happen to come up a lot in Munchausen by proxy cases or in suspected Munchausen by proxy cases, the reason for flagging those is not to say that anybody who has that diagnosis is a red flag.

Yeah, and we still have much more to unpack about this particular case, but whenever we are talking about illnesses that happen to come up a lot in Munchausen by proxy cases or in suspected Munchausen by proxy cases, the reason for flagging those is not to say that anybody who has that diagnosis is a red flag.

Yeah, and we still have much more to unpack about this particular case, but whenever we are talking about illnesses that happen to come up a lot in Munchausen by proxy cases or in suspected Munchausen by proxy cases, the reason for flagging those is not to say that anybody who has that diagnosis is a red flag.

we are trying to point out what the questionable patterns are that surround those diagnoses. Because we have very much seen that, the example I'm thinking at the top of my head is with like the AHC community that we covered in season five of the show, right?

we are trying to point out what the questionable patterns are that surround those diagnoses. Because we have very much seen that, the example I'm thinking at the top of my head is with like the AHC community that we covered in season five of the show, right?

we are trying to point out what the questionable patterns are that surround those diagnoses. Because we have very much seen that, the example I'm thinking at the top of my head is with like the AHC community that we covered in season five of the show, right?

That we've seen perpetrators take a lot of resources from those communities, mess the data up, especially if it's something that is super rare. And so we see a lot of harm to those communities of people that legitimately have these diseases and or people who are parents of children that have these diseases. We see a lot of harm being caused to those communities by perpetrators.