Andrea Dunlop

And, you know, something that is not mentioned contextually a lot of times in the media coverage of these cases is that child abuse pediatricians, number one, the data shows us that they find, you know, find have findings of abuse in less than 50 percent of the cases that they evaluate and also that they are less likely to come up with findings of abuse than their less well-trained colleagues.

And, you know, something that is not mentioned contextually a lot of times in the media coverage of these cases is that child abuse pediatricians, number one, the data shows us that they find, you know, find have findings of abuse in less than 50 percent of the cases that they evaluate and also that they are less likely to come up with findings of abuse than their less well-trained colleagues.

So, again, I think I said it in the last episode, but I will say if I am a parent who is not abusing my child, I want a child abuse pediatrician making that evaluation. They're less likely to make mistakes.

So, again, I think I said it in the last episode, but I will say if I am a parent who is not abusing my child, I want a child abuse pediatrician making that evaluation. They're less likely to make mistakes.

So, again, I think I said it in the last episode, but I will say if I am a parent who is not abusing my child, I want a child abuse pediatrician making that evaluation. They're less likely to make mistakes.

Yeah, it's it's pretty loaded. And I think, yeah, again, with the standard being reasonable suspicion. So I gather if you are talking about a false allegation,

Yeah, it's it's pretty loaded. And I think, yeah, again, with the standard being reasonable suspicion. So I gather if you are talking about a false allegation,

Yeah, it's it's pretty loaded. And I think, yeah, again, with the standard being reasonable suspicion. So I gather if you are talking about a false allegation,

know if an evaluation said that a parent falsified test documents or lied about you know a test result and they just didn't that's not what the medical record shows then that doesn't match up with the medical record then then yeah i mean that would be but it sort of there's a lot of room for for speculation so this this family is saying then that

know if an evaluation said that a parent falsified test documents or lied about you know a test result and they just didn't that's not what the medical record shows then that doesn't match up with the medical record then then yeah i mean that would be but it sort of there's a lot of room for for speculation so this this family is saying then that

know if an evaluation said that a parent falsified test documents or lied about you know a test result and they just didn't that's not what the medical record shows then that doesn't match up with the medical record then then yeah i mean that would be but it sort of there's a lot of room for for speculation so this this family is saying then that

The second report, then we're at the second report that was made when when Madison enters radio children's so yeah take us back to the timeline so there's a period of we know there's a period of covert video surveillance and then how long into her stay there is this second report.

The second report, then we're at the second report that was made when when Madison enters radio children's so yeah take us back to the timeline so there's a period of we know there's a period of covert video surveillance and then how long into her stay there is this second report.

The second report, then we're at the second report that was made when when Madison enters radio children's so yeah take us back to the timeline so there's a period of we know there's a period of covert video surveillance and then how long into her stay there is this second report.

So we can assume at this point that Dr D now is review and her evaluation process has had findings of abuse. We don't know what specifically was in her report. And we can also assume at this point that H H SA, which is their child protection state team in in California that that division has also done their completed their investigation. And has had positive findings for abuse.

So we can assume at this point that Dr D now is review and her evaluation process has had findings of abuse. We don't know what specifically was in her report. And we can also assume at this point that H H SA, which is their child protection state team in in California that that division has also done their completed their investigation. And has had positive findings for abuse.

So we can assume at this point that Dr D now is review and her evaluation process has had findings of abuse. We don't know what specifically was in her report. And we can also assume at this point that H H SA, which is their child protection state team in in California that that division has also done their completed their investigation. And has had positive findings for abuse.

So I think we can assume both of those things if a judge made this decision. So those two pieces of evidence. And again, like these investigations all look different. They're all kind of complimentary. You know, the child abuse pediatrician's job is to evaluate the medical piece of it. DCF or child, you know, CPS, those entities, their job is to decide whether or not

So I think we can assume both of those things if a judge made this decision. So those two pieces of evidence. And again, like these investigations all look different. They're all kind of complimentary. You know, the child abuse pediatrician's job is to evaluate the medical piece of it. DCF or child, you know, CPS, those entities, their job is to decide whether or not

So I think we can assume both of those things if a judge made this decision. So those two pieces of evidence. And again, like these investigations all look different. They're all kind of complimentary. You know, the child abuse pediatrician's job is to evaluate the medical piece of it. DCF or child, you know, CPS, those entities, their job is to decide whether or not