Andrew Doyle

And that's a non-crime hate incident for those of you in the UK who want to report it. And so he's six foot four, I think that's about right. Massive shoulders, you know, a fairly powerful swimmer. I think he ranked 400th in the US among American swimmers of his age, which is not bad, right? I mean, it's not number one and he definitely wanted to be number one.

And that's a non-crime hate incident for those of you in the UK who want to report it. And so he's six foot four, I think that's about right. Massive shoulders, you know, a fairly powerful swimmer. I think he ranked 400th in the US among American swimmers of his age, which is not bad, right? I mean, it's not number one and he definitely wanted to be number one.

But then you think, just put yourself in this position for a minute. You're like a foot and a half taller than the people that you're competing against and six inches broader in the shoulder. And when you get up on the podium and there's a claim, not only do you enjoy it, which is a sign that there's something seriously wrong with you to begin with, but you also are so deluded.

But then you think, just put yourself in this position for a minute. You're like a foot and a half taller than the people that you're competing against and six inches broader in the shoulder. And when you get up on the podium and there's a claim, not only do you enjoy it, which is a sign that there's something seriously wrong with you to begin with, but you also are so deluded.

But then you think, just put yourself in this position for a minute. You're like a foot and a half taller than the people that you're competing against and six inches broader in the shoulder. And when you get up on the podium and there's a claim, not only do you enjoy it, which is a sign that there's something seriously wrong with you to begin with, but you also are so deluded.

that you think you deserve it, and that you're a brave once victim for managing it. Now, just contemplate that. Imagine writing a script about that. Do you know how... staggeringly narcissistic you have to be to accept even one of those propositions, let alone to play yourself off as a heroic victim while you're doing it.

that you think you deserve it, and that you're a brave once victim for managing it. Now, just contemplate that. Imagine writing a script about that. Do you know how... staggeringly narcissistic you have to be to accept even one of those propositions, let alone to play yourself off as a heroic victim while you're doing it.

that you think you deserve it, and that you're a brave once victim for managing it. Now, just contemplate that. Imagine writing a script about that. Do you know how... staggeringly narcissistic you have to be to accept even one of those propositions, let alone to play yourself off as a heroic victim while you're doing it.

You knock these poor women off their podium and it's like you're the forthright champion of what? Civil rights or something. It's so sickening.

You knock these poor women off their podium and it's like you're the forthright champion of what? Civil rights or something. It's so sickening.

You knock these poor women off their podium and it's like you're the forthright champion of what? Civil rights or something. It's so sickening.

Well, I think there'd be two reasons. The first thing we need to understand is that the... camouflage in which the narcissists and butchers that we're describing enmesh themselves is in the camouflage of empathy. And empathy is a cardinal moral virtue. Now, the problem is, the problem starts when you believe that the fundamental essence of goodness is empathy, because that's wrong.

Well, I think there'd be two reasons. The first thing we need to understand is that the... camouflage in which the narcissists and butchers that we're describing enmesh themselves is in the camouflage of empathy. And empathy is a cardinal moral virtue. Now, the problem is, the problem starts when you believe that the fundamental essence of goodness is empathy, because that's wrong.

Well, I think there'd be two reasons. The first thing we need to understand is that the... camouflage in which the narcissists and butchers that we're describing enmesh themselves is in the camouflage of empathy. And empathy is a cardinal moral virtue. Now, the problem is, the problem starts when you believe that the fundamental essence of goodness is empathy, because that's wrong.

Goodness is much more complex than a mere one-dimensional analysis would presume. But if you're if I can accuse you of being non-empathetic, that's a pretty decent slur. Now, empathy also was a valid term impetus or motivation for many things that were laudable. So the American Civil Rights Movement, for example, right?

Goodness is much more complex than a mere one-dimensional analysis would presume. But if you're if I can accuse you of being non-empathetic, that's a pretty decent slur. Now, empathy also was a valid term impetus or motivation for many things that were laudable. So the American Civil Rights Movement, for example, right?

Goodness is much more complex than a mere one-dimensional analysis would presume. But if you're if I can accuse you of being non-empathetic, that's a pretty decent slur. Now, empathy also was a valid term impetus or motivation for many things that were laudable. So the American Civil Rights Movement, for example, right?

Now the problem is, is that it can, and this is the problem, this is being demonstrated time and again by game theorists working in the biological realm. Imagine you have a community of cooperators, a game that's set up so that people only cooperate. If everyone cooperates, the game can sustain itself and improve as it's played. But if you throw one shark into the tank, then it takes everything.

Now the problem is, is that it can, and this is the problem, this is being demonstrated time and again by game theorists working in the biological realm. Imagine you have a community of cooperators, a game that's set up so that people only cooperate. If everyone cooperates, the game can sustain itself and improve as it's played. But if you throw one shark into the tank, then it takes everything.

Now the problem is, is that it can, and this is the problem, this is being demonstrated time and again by game theorists working in the biological realm. Imagine you have a community of cooperators, a game that's set up so that people only cooperate. If everyone cooperates, the game can sustain itself and improve as it's played. But if you throw one shark into the tank, then it takes everything.