Andrew Doyle

It's also a movement that was based on the belief that virtually every form of interaction can be construed as a kind of bullying, given that there's no human motivation fundamentally other than that of power.

It's also a movement that was based on the belief that virtually every form of interaction can be construed as a kind of bullying, given that there's no human motivation fundamentally other than that of power.

That's exactly right. I've looked into this quite deeply at a psychological level, and I think you can make a strong biological case at the level of perception that there is no distinction more fundamental than the distinction between male and female. It's more... It's more fundamental than up and down. It's more fundamental than black and white or night and day.

That's exactly right. I've looked into this quite deeply at a psychological level, and I think you can make a strong biological case at the level of perception that there is no distinction more fundamental than the distinction between male and female. It's more... It's more fundamental than up and down. It's more fundamental than black and white or night and day.

That's exactly right. I've looked into this quite deeply at a psychological level, and I think you can make a strong biological case at the level of perception that there is no distinction more fundamental than the distinction between male and female. It's more... It's more fundamental than up and down. It's more fundamental than black and white or night and day.

And if you can get people to swallow the equivalence of that fundamental pair of opposites, there is absolutely no lie whatsoever that they'll resist.

And if you can get people to swallow the equivalence of that fundamental pair of opposites, there is absolutely no lie whatsoever that they'll resist.

And if you can get people to swallow the equivalence of that fundamental pair of opposites, there is absolutely no lie whatsoever that they'll resist.

That's my point. It's the compulsion too that's the problem, right? The fact that you... This is why I objected to Bill C-16 back in about 2016. You know, I can say whatever I want, fundamentally, but the government doesn't get to compel it. And I don't care if the reason is hypothetically empathy and compassion. It's like, first of all, I doubt that. And second, it doesn't matter.

That's my point. It's the compulsion too that's the problem, right? The fact that you... This is why I objected to Bill C-16 back in about 2016. You know, I can say whatever I want, fundamentally, but the government doesn't get to compel it. And I don't care if the reason is hypothetically empathy and compassion. It's like, first of all, I doubt that. And second, it doesn't matter.

That's my point. It's the compulsion too that's the problem, right? The fact that you... This is why I objected to Bill C-16 back in about 2016. You know, I can say whatever I want, fundamentally, but the government doesn't get to compel it. And I don't care if the reason is hypothetically empathy and compassion. It's like, first of all, I doubt that. And second, it doesn't matter.

Well, what can you expect from a TERF?

Well, what can you expect from a TERF?

Well, what can you expect from a TERF?

There's a problem there fundamentally that's akin to the problem of the center and the margin. No, the postmodernists, the French intellectuals, assumed that the reason that any center was established was for no other reason than that of power. And so they construed the center against its opposite, let's say. That's like a dialectic of thesis and antithesis.

There's a problem there fundamentally that's akin to the problem of the center and the margin. No, the postmodernists, the French intellectuals, assumed that the reason that any center was established was for no other reason than that of power. And so they construed the center against its opposite, let's say. That's like a dialectic of thesis and antithesis.

There's a problem there fundamentally that's akin to the problem of the center and the margin. No, the postmodernists, the French intellectuals, assumed that the reason that any center was established was for no other reason than that of power. And so they construed the center against its opposite, let's say. That's like a dialectic of thesis and antithesis.

But there's a problem with that conceptually, because the center is always a unity. and any unity is surrounded by a margin right now.

But there's a problem with that conceptually, because the center is always a unity. and any unity is surrounded by a margin right now.

But there's a problem with that conceptually, because the center is always a unity. and any unity is surrounded by a margin right now.