Andrew Gruel

Let's give a handful of corporations the ability to work hand in glove with the government behind closed doors to continue to manipulate the food supply and manipulate the food supply in a manner in which we give power to a small handful or cadre of people. Right. So look at what's happened with Monsanto. Look at what's what happened with a lot of these corporations.

patented modifications on our crops and fertilizers, et cetera, which have, once again, consolidated the hands of our food system, agricultural, terrestrial, all across the board into a few big corporations and has made the food less healthy. It's ruined the soil. There's been all these unintended consequences. So it's the same idea.

patented modifications on our crops and fertilizers, et cetera, which have, once again, consolidated the hands of our food system, agricultural, terrestrial, all across the board into a few big corporations and has made the food less healthy. It's ruined the soil. There's been all these unintended consequences. So it's the same idea.

Yeah, you have something good and then the government gets involved and it turns into something bad. It's the same old formula over and over again. That calculus could be repeated in every single industry, every single conversation.

Yeah, you have something good and then the government gets involved and it turns into something bad. It's the same old formula over and over again. That calculus could be repeated in every single industry, every single conversation.

I like talking about it through food because that's approachable and people understand it as opposed to a lot of the obfuscation that we see in other areas of the government. But now look right now, right? Geoengineering. We're seeing a lot about cloud seeding and these chemtrails, et cetera. Let's put the chemtrails aside. Let's just talk about geoengineering in general.

I like talking about it through food because that's approachable and people understand it as opposed to a lot of the obfuscation that we see in other areas of the government. But now look right now, right? Geoengineering. We're seeing a lot about cloud seeding and these chemtrails, et cetera. Let's put the chemtrails aside. Let's just talk about geoengineering in general.

and manipulating the environment, the air above us. That is a fact. That is a proven fact. And so much of it hasn't been studied. And yet the government kind of controls those mechanisms by which they're engineering the ecosystem. And what's the long-term effect of that going to be? Some of it is said to be good right now, just like it could have been with GMOs in the 60s and 70s.

and manipulating the environment, the air above us. That is a fact. That is a proven fact. And so much of it hasn't been studied. And yet the government kind of controls those mechanisms by which they're engineering the ecosystem. And what's the long-term effect of that going to be? Some of it is said to be good right now, just like it could have been with GMOs in the 60s and 70s.

But now fast forward five decades, and what do we have going on?

But now fast forward five decades, and what do we have going on?

Now it seems like she's got this long-term dry eye situation. I think she's been hanging out with the chickens at night, but we can talk about that behind closed doors.

Now it seems like she's got this long-term dry eye situation. I think she's been hanging out with the chickens at night, but we can talk about that behind closed doors.

Just a mere question itself should not be a catalyst for backlash and being called a conspiracy theorist. And this is what I see out of Maha, right? Everybody kind of has their own definition. Some are very, very specific. Some are kind of really granular. And in my case, it's a bit more nuanced.

Just a mere question itself should not be a catalyst for backlash and being called a conspiracy theorist. And this is what I see out of Maha, right? Everybody kind of has their own definition. Some are very, very specific. Some are kind of really granular. And in my case, it's a bit more nuanced.

And I think from a much grander perspective in the sense that, number one, we're talking about all this. That's key. Number two, the information is transparent. I don't believe we're going to get into a world where we completely flip the government upside down and we're able to shake out big pharma and all the corporate interest that's already stitched into the framework of the government.

And I think from a much grander perspective in the sense that, number one, we're talking about all this. That's key. Number two, the information is transparent. I don't believe we're going to get into a world where we completely flip the government upside down and we're able to shake out big pharma and all the corporate interest that's already stitched into the framework of the government.

Instead, I believe that it's going to be a one or two or three step process. We got to stew the meat. We can't boil it. So what I see happening right now is that the media is trying to create conflict within the Maha Maga movement because it scares them. Because as Jack said, it's one of the most powerful political movements we've seen in probably 100 years.

Instead, I believe that it's going to be a one or two or three step process. We got to stew the meat. We can't boil it. So what I see happening right now is that the media is trying to create conflict within the Maha Maga movement because it scares them. Because as Jack said, it's one of the most powerful political movements we've seen in probably 100 years.

And in what they're doing, though, is they're telling on themselves because now we're in this stage one piece of the conversation and we're all talking about it. And now it's under this microscope. People are going to be loud about it.