Andrew Klavan

That's what they call them.

One other point I want to make, though, about the filibuster thing is when we say that, well, you know, we keep the filibuster in place, that means that neither side can advance their agenda.

And, yeah, if you had some kind of solution like it's enshrined in the Constitution, then that means that no one can advance it.

It seems like a clever idea, but the problem is that that's not exactly how it works because it's not a fair fight.

It's stacked against us because the left, even when they're not in power politically, they still own all of our institutions.

They still now, even in this, what's allegedly the golden age and wokeness is dead,

They still own academia and the public school system and the media and Hollywood, the entertainment industry.

I mean, all of it.

And they still have things like SPLC and dozens of others of these sort of, as I said, kind of quasi governmental agency NGO things running.

And so they still have all of that.

And so even when they're not in political power, they can still advance their agenda that way.

Now, if we're on the right, I mean.

When we have political power, that's kind of all we got.

You have the power.

We really don't have any power in any other institutions.

So if you're not going to use it here, you don't have it anywhere else.

So that's just another reason for when you have the opportunity, you advance the ball.

And the last thing I'll say about that is I'm not an accelerationist, whatever that term means exactly.

But if we ended up in a position where the filibuster is gone and then we have these wild swings one way and then the other, that's not ideal.

I don't want that.