Andrew T

Or that hierarchy, opposition to hierarchy is stupid because, you know, food chains or, you know, the hierarchy of needs. But as you know, anarchists are focused on very specific things when we use these terms. So arguing against it with other definitions doesn't make sense. And bi-hierarchy is...

Anarchists are for just stratification of society, which gives some individuals, groups, or institutions authority over others. And authority refers to the recognized right above others in a social relationship to give commands, to enforce obedience, to control property, to exploit, and so on.

Anarchists are for just stratification of society, which gives some individuals, groups, or institutions authority over others. And authority refers to the recognized right above others in a social relationship to give commands, to enforce obedience, to control property, to exploit, and so on.

Anarchists are for just stratification of society, which gives some individuals, groups, or institutions authority over others. And authority refers to the recognized right above others in a social relationship to give commands, to enforce obedience, to control property, to exploit, and so on.

And I really don't see the benefit in Chomsky's sort of unjust authorities or unjust hierarchies approach to define him. And I feel so.

And I really don't see the benefit in Chomsky's sort of unjust authorities or unjust hierarchies approach to define him. And I feel so.

And I really don't see the benefit in Chomsky's sort of unjust authorities or unjust hierarchies approach to define him. And I feel so.

Exactly, which is why I say opposition to all authorities and their justifying dogmas. Because all of them have dogmas, including the example that Chomsky uses, which is typically of the parent pulling their child away from traffic. That is not an exercise of authority. And the relationship between a parent and a child is something that can and should be interrogated.

Exactly, which is why I say opposition to all authorities and their justifying dogmas. Because all of them have dogmas, including the example that Chomsky uses, which is typically of the parent pulling their child away from traffic. That is not an exercise of authority. And the relationship between a parent and a child is something that can and should be interrogated.

Exactly, which is why I say opposition to all authorities and their justifying dogmas. Because all of them have dogmas, including the example that Chomsky uses, which is typically of the parent pulling their child away from traffic. That is not an exercise of authority. And the relationship between a parent and a child is something that can and should be interrogated.

You know, that is a caretaking relationship primarily, a relationship of responsibility. It does not have to be a relationship of authority in the sense that I suppose.

You know, that is a caretaking relationship primarily, a relationship of responsibility. It does not have to be a relationship of authority in the sense that I suppose.

You know, that is a caretaking relationship primarily, a relationship of responsibility. It does not have to be a relationship of authority in the sense that I suppose.

Exactly. Because then it also makes it harder for people to sort of question the authority they're more comfortable with, or the hierarchies they're more comfortable with. So you'll see that where so-called anarchists say, oh, no, we don't actually oppose all hierarchies. You know, parents think, and it really...

Exactly. Because then it also makes it harder for people to sort of question the authority they're more comfortable with, or the hierarchies they're more comfortable with. So you'll see that where so-called anarchists say, oh, no, we don't actually oppose all hierarchies. You know, parents think, and it really...

Exactly. Because then it also makes it harder for people to sort of question the authority they're more comfortable with, or the hierarchies they're more comfortable with. So you'll see that where so-called anarchists say, oh, no, we don't actually oppose all hierarchies. You know, parents think, and it really...

You're seeding ground in a sense because you make it harder to identify and really question those things because you're shutting down that avenue of questioning. And so when we speak of authority, we're really speaking about that right, the rights that authority gives to certain people over other people, privileges that are recognized and enforced.

You're seeding ground in a sense because you make it harder to identify and really question those things because you're shutting down that avenue of questioning. And so when we speak of authority, we're really speaking about that right, the rights that authority gives to certain people over other people, privileges that are recognized and enforced.

You're seeding ground in a sense because you make it harder to identify and really question those things because you're shutting down that avenue of questioning. And so when we speak of authority, we're really speaking about that right, the rights that authority gives to certain people over other people, privileges that are recognized and enforced.

and a right being a sort of a priority that is above others. You know, the right of authority is a guarantee to actions or resources that absolve the individual holding that right of consequences. The right of authority compels and subordinates the desires and needs of those below that authority. So, you know, authorities have the right to command, recognized and enforced by their underlings.