Andrew Weissmann

the E. Jean Carroll case, where there were two separate verdicts in favor of E. Jean Carroll, and he was the judge who oversaw that case. So, in a separate case, he actually appointed a special prosecutor to go forward with a case which he thought was meritorious.

the E. Jean Carroll case, where there were two separate verdicts in favor of E. Jean Carroll, and he was the judge who oversaw that case. So, in a separate case, he actually appointed a special prosecutor to go forward with a case which he thought was meritorious.

Let's assume that Emil can't find a prosecutor. He goes through thousands of people. But let's say he does it or he finds somebody to do it. And they go into court and they say, Judge Ho, we would like to withdraw this case. The judge does not have to agree to that. The judge could say, why?

Let's assume that Emil can't find a prosecutor. He goes through thousands of people. But let's say he does it or he finds somebody to do it. And they go into court and they say, Judge Ho, we would like to withdraw this case. The judge does not have to agree to that. The judge could say, why?

Let's assume that Emil can't find a prosecutor. He goes through thousands of people. But let's say he does it or he finds somebody to do it. And they go into court and they say, Judge Ho, we would like to withdraw this case. The judge does not have to agree to that. The judge could say, why?

why do you want to do this and if the judge were to hold a hearing and conclude that there was an improper quid pro quo here the judge would be again it's limited authority but he'd be within his rights to say the court is not going to be a part of this and then the case is not dismissed so it's not a unilateral authority for the prosecutors to say we're not going forward.

why do you want to do this and if the judge were to hold a hearing and conclude that there was an improper quid pro quo here the judge would be again it's limited authority but he'd be within his rights to say the court is not going to be a part of this and then the case is not dismissed so it's not a unilateral authority for the prosecutors to say we're not going forward.

why do you want to do this and if the judge were to hold a hearing and conclude that there was an improper quid pro quo here the judge would be again it's limited authority but he'd be within his rights to say the court is not going to be a part of this and then the case is not dismissed so it's not a unilateral authority for the prosecutors to say we're not going forward.

She isn't. You know, it's so funny. She will be, though, because she is going to be vilified the way Bill Barr is now viewed. Like, Bill Barr and Andrew Weissman are now, it's like they're one in the same. It's like, why? Because we did something that Donald Trump doesn't like.

She isn't. You know, it's so funny. She will be, though, because she is going to be vilified the way Bill Barr is now viewed. Like, Bill Barr and Andrew Weissman are now, it's like they're one in the same. It's like, why? Because we did something that Donald Trump doesn't like.

She isn't. You know, it's so funny. She will be, though, because she is going to be vilified the way Bill Barr is now viewed. Like, Bill Barr and Andrew Weissman are now, it's like they're one in the same. It's like, why? Because we did something that Donald Trump doesn't like.

It is. You know, this is where, I mean, I hate to sound Pollyannish or naive or be on a soapbox, but What you are seeing at the Southern District of New York, at main justice in the public integrity section, and just let's not remember that this is all on the heels of everything we're seeing at the FBI, which is also not a hotbed of the deep state.

It is. You know, this is where, I mean, I hate to sound Pollyannish or naive or be on a soapbox, but What you are seeing at the Southern District of New York, at main justice in the public integrity section, and just let's not remember that this is all on the heels of everything we're seeing at the FBI, which is also not a hotbed of the deep state.

It is. You know, this is where, I mean, I hate to sound Pollyannish or naive or be on a soapbox, but What you are seeing at the Southern District of New York, at main justice in the public integrity section, and just let's not remember that this is all on the heels of everything we're seeing at the FBI, which is also not a hotbed of the deep state.

It is a conservative organization where the acting head of the FBI, Special Agent Driscoll, was also selected by Trump to lead that agency while they await the confirmation of Kash Patel. All of them have been pushing back. And that's where what I would tell you, and again, I don't mean to sound Pollyannish, but people act out of principle.

It is a conservative organization where the acting head of the FBI, Special Agent Driscoll, was also selected by Trump to lead that agency while they await the confirmation of Kash Patel. All of them have been pushing back. And that's where what I would tell you, and again, I don't mean to sound Pollyannish, but people act out of principle.

It is a conservative organization where the acting head of the FBI, Special Agent Driscoll, was also selected by Trump to lead that agency while they await the confirmation of Kash Patel. All of them have been pushing back. And that's where what I would tell you, and again, I don't mean to sound Pollyannish, but people act out of principle.

All of these people, when I was in the department, their policies you agree with and you disagree with. There are Democrats and Republicans in the White House that come in all the time. And you're used to policy directives that you have to implement. And if you can't stomach it at all, you can leave.

All of these people, when I was in the department, their policies you agree with and you disagree with. There are Democrats and Republicans in the White House that come in all the time. And you're used to policy directives that you have to implement. And if you can't stomach it at all, you can leave.

All of these people, when I was in the department, their policies you agree with and you disagree with. There are Democrats and Republicans in the White House that come in all the time. And you're used to policy directives that you have to implement. And if you can't stomach it at all, you can leave.