Andy Lowery

We have lots of information, commercial information around

and commercial testing around bigger systems that enterprising people pick up out of the field into Ukraine that get downed, and then we buy those commercially, and we test our system to see the viability.

And it does seem to have good effects, at least in a chamber where we test it.

We haven't flown a Shahid at it or anything like that.

We don't have any Shahid pilots, and

don't have a shot head that's operational.

So we rig up the systems that we have and we're able to gain access to, and we test in the chamber how our system would affect the system out in the field.

And we have kind of math equations that are really accurate, like within 5%.

If we can down the drone inside of our chamber at such a distance

a calculated distance than it equates to that same distance out in the field.

So we do believe they will be effective against group threes.

It is effective against group threes, but I wouldn't, I wouldn't call it again.

I just caution everyone to say nothing is a panacea.

There's always need for layers.

There's always need for more than just one set of stopping things.

You have to have other different types of systems in order to, uh,

be safe, in order to be safe and get everything.

If we do what I hope we're able to do, it will change the face of drone warfare completely.

Now, I'm not saying it will obsolete it because this is a chess game or cat and mouse game, you know, where...

You know, they build a bigger mouse trap and they figure out a better mouse.