Andy

focused on coding to a large degree.

And then for multimodal work, it's not necessary to apply Gemini 3's deep thinking, but you can see that the top scores are achieved for all of these multimodal tests by Gemini 3 Pro.

And that kind of breaks down the players here.

And frankly, it tells me that open AI really isn't in the running so much anymore as are Gemini and Claude.

So that's my takeaway on that.

Discuss.

Let me just say one thing about Claude, which is, unlike Gemini, it isn't particularly multimodal.

And so if you're doing stuff with text, it's good.

It's probably the best.

If you're coding, it's clearly the best option in my view.

For the general use of an AI system, Gemini, with the ability to do things like generate a slide deck and or simultaneously do infographics that are complex around the text that you're working with, that I think makes it...

Rich D' Advent and advantageous to work in the Gemini ecosystem, not to mention all of the connectors and integrations that exist and will exist with Google going forward.

Yeah.

Good point.

And those of you who remember back to the days gone by when I was working on the Sensei project, I was using Gemini 2.5 Pro as a coding supervisor on top of Claude within Lovable.

So Claude was the Claude Sonnet 3.5, and then Claude Sonnet 4.5 now is the coding agent inside Lovable.

But I found that Gemini 2.5 Pro had a more expansive, more comprehensive, I should say, understanding of the coding work that we were doing together.

And the lovable agent inside there lost track and went willy-nilly quite often.

And I used Gemini to bring it back in line.

Yes, I do.